John Sweeny Jr., the Only Remaining Republican Supreme Court Judge in Manhattan, Calls It Quits After 30-Year Career
John Sweeny Jr., who is from Putnam County, was one of 10 Republican judges transported to Manhattan by Republican Gov. George Pataki in a controversial move to bring conservative voices to an appellate court he considered too liberal.
July 22, 2019 at 04:30 AM
6 minute read
When John Sweeny Jr. retires this year from the Appellate Division after a 32-year career, there will be no Republican Supreme Court justices in Manhattan or the Bronx. Or Queens or Brooklyn for that matter.
Sweeny, who is from Putnam County, was one of 10 Republican Supreme Court judges transported to the Appellate Division in Manhattan by Republican Gov. George Pataki in a controversial move to bring conservative voices to a court he considered too liberal. Some of the Republican judges Pataki brought in came from more than 100 miles away because the governor couldn't find enough like-minded judges in New York City.
“Pataki had been openly critical of judges whom he believed had treated defendants too leniently. Some in the legal community argued at the time that the transfer of judges was an effort on his part to alter the ideological makeup of the First Department, said Barry Kamins, who was president of the New York City Bar Association when Pataki was governor.
“In my opinion, this policy was ill-advised, since the courts of a community should have an understanding of the people they serve as well as a connection to their culture,” said Kamins who was the administrative judge of the Criminal Court of New York City before returning to private practice.
Appointees to the state's four Appellate Divisions must be sitting Supreme Court judges who are nominated by party conventions and elected, and New York City voters rarely elect Republican judges. Staten Island is the only borough with any Republican Supreme Court judges: Justices Ralph Porzio and Marina Cora Mundy, who were elected this past November. So when Pataki looked for Republicans in the First Department, he didn't find any.
The Republicans he did find in other parts of the state have since retired, gone back to their home counties or lost reelection, making Sweeny the lone Republican on the court for the last four years. Justice David Friedman, a Brooklyn Democrat Pataki appointed to the First Department, is the governor's only judge still assigned to the ornate Madison Avenue courthouse, which covers Manhattan and the Bronx.
“I think he was a really great judge,” Friedman said in recounting the years he spent sitting next to Sweeny on the bench. “When we take the bench, we have to try to leave our agendas and our previous thoughts behind. He was someone who very much epitomized looking at each case on its own merits.”
Retired Justice David Saxe, who left the court in 2017 and become a partner at Morrison Cohen, was one of only three Democrats Pataki appointed to the court in his three terms as governor between 1995 and 2006.
“I never thought of Sweeny or any of the others as Republican judges. I thought of them as upstate judges. He was a very balanced jurist and frankly, I thought he fit right in with the downstaters. I didn't think that anybody treated them like pariahs,” Saxe said.
First Department Presiding Justice Rolando Acosta said that Sweeny's departure means the court will have five vacancies including Justice Marcy Kahn who is retiring in September. In April, in a break from longstanding tradition, the court reduced some of its five-judge panels to four because of the vacancies.
Two of the vacancies go back to 2017 when Judge Paul Feinman was elevated to the Court of Appeals and Justice Karla Moskowitz reached the mandatory retirement age of 76. Justice Richard Andrias, the only other Democrat Pataki appointed to the court, retired last year. Gov. Andrew Cuomo has yet to name any replacements.
“We often speak of diversity in terms of immutable characteristics, gender, race, ethnicity,” Acosta said. “Although we need to talk more about diversity of perspective and bring in different experiences. How you examine the underlying facts of the case. That's what John brought to the bench with a lot of care, a lot of sensitivity.”
Sweeny, who could have stayed on the court until age 76, decided not to apply to remain past age 70 and so must now leave by the end of the year. In an interview last week, he said that he may decide to retire sooner because of serious health problems. “I'm playing it day by day right now,” he said.
“It's a mixed feeling because this has been home for 15 years and I've been a judge for 32 years,” he said.
While Sweeny acknowledges he has often been in the minority, he said his colleagues appreciate hearing his more conservative views. “The whole experience, It has been very collegial. We may disagree on matters, but it's never been an all-out war,” he said.
Sweeny was first elected to the Putnam County Court in 1986 and the New York State Supreme Court in 1999. Pataki appointed him to the Appellate Division in 2004. Chief Judge Janet DiFiore selected him to serve by special designation on the state's highest court, the New York State Court of Appeals, in February.
Sweeny said the cases he handled on the Court of Appeals were the capstone of his career. Asked to name his most important decision, he said it wouldn't be any of the Commercial Division cases that were worth millions and millions of dollars. Instead, he said, it would be the domestic violence or custody cases he handled as a Family Court judge because ordinary people depended on him to make the right decision.
“In some cases, he gave a little bit of a different perspective. But it was always very rational, never confrontational,” said First Department Justice Barbara Kapnick. “He also was a Family Court judge and I think he was terrific when it came to Family Court issues.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
3 minute readUS Courts Announce Closures in Observance of Jimmy Carter National Mourning Day
2 minute readNew York State's 37th Veterans Treatment Court Opens With New Program in Cattaraugus County
Trending Stories
- 1Elite Acquires Payment Platform Tranch to Boost Law Firm Financial Management Capabilities
- 2Lawsuit alleges Fox Sports ex-host harassed hairstylist and offered her $1.5M for sex
- 3Managing Risk in a Risky World in Mediation
- 4No Pa. Case Has Ever Adjudicated a Claim to Enforce an Environmental Covenant Imposed Under 'Act 2'—Does That Matter?
- 5KPMG Law US Seeks Alternative Business License, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250