Transfer Motion Schedule Set in Case Accusing Avenatti of Stealing From Stormy Daniels
U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts of the Southern District of New York set Aug. 22 as the date for Avenatti to file his Rule 21 transfer motion.
July 23, 2019 at 05:28 PM
4 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge is set to consider arguments in the coming weeks on Michael Avenatti's request to transfer a criminal case accusing him of stealing $300,000 from his former client, Stephanie Clifford, the adult film star who performed under the name Stormy Daniels, to a California federal court.
According to a court spokesman, U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts of the Southern District of New York set Aug. 22 as the date for Avenatti to file his Rule 21 transfer motion during a brief status conference Tuesday in one of two criminal cases currently pending against Avenatti in New York, Avenatti's attorney said. The government is scheduled to respond by Sept. 11.
Prosecutors alleged in a May 22 indictment that Avenatti, an outspoken attorney known for his criticisms of President Donald Trump, had diverted two payments of $150,000 from an advance on a book deal being paid to Clifford.
According to the indictment, Avenatti forged Clifford's name on a letter to her literary agent and instructed the payments to be sent to a bank account under his own control. Prosecutors said that Clifford did not know about the other bank account and that half of the diverted sum had never been repaid.
The indictment claimed that Avenatti had used the funds for a range of personal and professional purposes unrelated to his client, including paying employees of his law firm and coffee business and to pay for flights, hotels and dry cleaning.
Avenatti's attorney, H. Dean Steward, had asked Batts to combine the case with a sweeping action already pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, where Avenatti is accused of embezzling millions of dollars from other clients. The Rule 21 transfer motion, Steward said, was a threshold issue that should be decided before trial was scheduled in the case.
Prosecutors, however, said the case belongs in the Southern District of New York and are opposing the transfer motion.
The California case accuses Avenatti of 36 counts of tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud and other charges in connection with the alleged theft from former clients. In particular, he faces 10 counts of wire fraud for pocketing millions of dollars from more than $12 million he received during the past five years as part of four settlements, including one on behalf of a paraplegic client.
In addition to embezzling clients, the charges also include 19 counts of failing to file income tax returns, both personal and on behalf of his businesses, including his law firms, Avenatti & Associates and Eagan Avenatti, which filed for bankruptcy in 2017. The charges also include four counts of bankruptcy fraud against Avenatti for concealing assets, including $1.36 million in attorney fees from a settlement of litigation brought by ticket holders of the 2011 Super Bowl.
If convicted, he faces 333 years in federal prison, plus two more years of a mandatory consecutive sentence on an aggravated identity theft count related to the bank fraud allegations.
Steward, who represents Avenatti in both cases, said in a July 18 letter to Batts that the California action is locked in ongoing discovery disputes, and a trial date had not yet been set.
Avenatti, who has posted bond in both cases, is also currently awaiting trial in November on separate charges in New York stemming from an alleged extortion scheme to shakedown Nike just ahead of a quarterly earnings report in March. Avenatti has hired Miami-based attorneys Scott Srebnick and Jose Quinon to represent him in that case.
Read More:
Michael Avenatti Charged With Fraud, Stealing From Ex-Client Stormy Daniels in New Indictments
Michael Avenatti Hires Lawyers Outside of NY To Fight Nike Extortion Charges
Prosecutors Announce Charges Against Attorney Michael Avenatti
Michael Avenatti Charged With Stealing Millions From Clients in 36-Count Indictment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Trending Stories
- 1The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 2Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 3As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 4The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
- 5NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250