Transfer Motion Schedule Set in Case Accusing Avenatti of Stealing From Stormy Daniels
U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts of the Southern District of New York set Aug. 22 as the date for Avenatti to file his Rule 21 transfer motion.
July 23, 2019 at 05:28 PM
4 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge is set to consider arguments in the coming weeks on Michael Avenatti's request to transfer a criminal case accusing him of stealing $300,000 from his former client, Stephanie Clifford, the adult film star who performed under the name Stormy Daniels, to a California federal court.
According to a court spokesman, U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts of the Southern District of New York set Aug. 22 as the date for Avenatti to file his Rule 21 transfer motion during a brief status conference Tuesday in one of two criminal cases currently pending against Avenatti in New York, Avenatti's attorney said. The government is scheduled to respond by Sept. 11.
Prosecutors alleged in a May 22 indictment that Avenatti, an outspoken attorney known for his criticisms of President Donald Trump, had diverted two payments of $150,000 from an advance on a book deal being paid to Clifford.
According to the indictment, Avenatti forged Clifford's name on a letter to her literary agent and instructed the payments to be sent to a bank account under his own control. Prosecutors said that Clifford did not know about the other bank account and that half of the diverted sum had never been repaid.
The indictment claimed that Avenatti had used the funds for a range of personal and professional purposes unrelated to his client, including paying employees of his law firm and coffee business and to pay for flights, hotels and dry cleaning.
Avenatti's attorney, H. Dean Steward, had asked Batts to combine the case with a sweeping action already pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, where Avenatti is accused of embezzling millions of dollars from other clients. The Rule 21 transfer motion, Steward said, was a threshold issue that should be decided before trial was scheduled in the case.
Prosecutors, however, said the case belongs in the Southern District of New York and are opposing the transfer motion.
The California case accuses Avenatti of 36 counts of tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud and other charges in connection with the alleged theft from former clients. In particular, he faces 10 counts of wire fraud for pocketing millions of dollars from more than $12 million he received during the past five years as part of four settlements, including one on behalf of a paraplegic client.
In addition to embezzling clients, the charges also include 19 counts of failing to file income tax returns, both personal and on behalf of his businesses, including his law firms, Avenatti & Associates and Eagan Avenatti, which filed for bankruptcy in 2017. The charges also include four counts of bankruptcy fraud against Avenatti for concealing assets, including $1.36 million in attorney fees from a settlement of litigation brought by ticket holders of the 2011 Super Bowl.
If convicted, he faces 333 years in federal prison, plus two more years of a mandatory consecutive sentence on an aggravated identity theft count related to the bank fraud allegations.
Steward, who represents Avenatti in both cases, said in a July 18 letter to Batts that the California action is locked in ongoing discovery disputes, and a trial date had not yet been set.
Avenatti, who has posted bond in both cases, is also currently awaiting trial in November on separate charges in New York stemming from an alleged extortion scheme to shakedown Nike just ahead of a quarterly earnings report in March. Avenatti has hired Miami-based attorneys Scott Srebnick and Jose Quinon to represent him in that case.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Judge Orders Rudy Giuliani to Court Amid Allegations He's Hiding Assets Under Receivership
'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250