'Cellino v. Barnes' Coming to a Theater Near You
Two New York comedy writers have created their own play based on the bitter breakup of a Buffalo personal-injury duo. The Law Journal spoke with one of the comedians about the writing process and how the show has been received.
July 25, 2019 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
Two New York comedians see the lighter side of the bitter dispute between Buffalo personal-injury duo Ross Cellino and Stephen Barnes.
Comedians Michael Breen and David Rafailedes have written their own play, “Cellino v. Barnes,” in which they portray the feuding lawyers. After performances in Buffalo and Los Angeles, the two-man show, directed by Hayley Huntley, is set to play Aug. 3 at the Bell House in Brooklyn.
When reached for comment, Cellino said his siblings told him they enjoyed the show and he plans to see it this year. Barnes didn't return a request for comment.
The New York Law Journal spoke with Rafailedes about the writing process and how he and Breen prepared to play lawyers who most New Yorkers know from their ubiquitous marketing presence and advertising jingle.
What motivated you to turn this legal drama into a play about two lawyers?
It's more a comedy than a drama. My writing partner, Michael Breen, is from Buffalo, where Cellino & Barnes are based. He said everywhere he went, strangers at the bar—everyone—was talking about them breaking up. They're like hometown heroes. We started reading about the breakup, and it was just too juicy, too funny, not to write about.
The show's marketing material says it's “loosely based” on the dispute. How deep into it did you get? Were you poring through court documents?
All our research came pretty much from other news stories. I've read them all. We hit, I believe, a lot of the major plot points about their breakup, but we're taking a little nugget of fact and kind of blowing that out in silly, extreme places.
Have you seen Cellino or Barnes in the audience? Have you gotten legal threats?
No, none at all. When we started doing it, we saw a lot of people buying tickets were coming through the law firm, and we said, 'I hope they don't hit us with a cease-and-desist.' But when we performed for the first time in Brooklyn, several people from the firm came. When we did it in Buffalo, several of Cellino's family members came. They really loved it; they told us it was super funny.
Do you come down on the side of Cellino versus Barnes?
We keep it kind of open. When we started out, we tended toward Barnes being the villain. But they both tend toward extremes.
How did you develop these characters? Did you see them in court? Just from commercials?
We'd read in the paper that Cellino said, 'I'm gonna burn this place to the ground.' The character comes through. Someone who worked on their commercials reached out to us and said we nailed the personalities. I also watched a video of Barnes delivering a hyper-detailed speech on medical malpractice—he's just so intense and straightforward. The mannerisms are there, but the accent is more mine.
So do these characters complement each other, like Abbott and Costello?
They absolutely complement each other. Cellino is positioned as a more fun guy, and Barnes really wants to take over the world.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style, grammar and clarity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Quinn Emanuel's Michael Carlinsky on Training Associates to Think and Act Like Trial Lawyers
Innovation Award Individual Finalist: Charlie Hernandez, My Pocket Lawyer
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legaltech Rundown: LexisNexis Releases Lexis+ AI Mobile App, Hotshot Launches New M&A Training Simulation, and More
- 2Perkins Coie Boasts Diverse Partner Class
- 3NY Judge Indefinitely Delays Sentencing in Trump Hush Money Case
- 4US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250