'Cellino v. Barnes' Coming to a Theater Near You
Two New York comedy writers have created their own play based on the bitter breakup of a Buffalo personal-injury duo. The Law Journal spoke with one of the comedians about the writing process and how the show has been received.
July 25, 2019 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
Two New York comedians see the lighter side of the bitter dispute between Buffalo personal-injury duo Ross Cellino and Stephen Barnes.
Comedians Michael Breen and David Rafailedes have written their own play, “Cellino v. Barnes,” in which they portray the feuding lawyers. After performances in Buffalo and Los Angeles, the two-man show, directed by Hayley Huntley, is set to play Aug. 3 at the Bell House in Brooklyn.
When reached for comment, Cellino said his siblings told him they enjoyed the show and he plans to see it this year. Barnes didn't return a request for comment.
The New York Law Journal spoke with Rafailedes about the writing process and how he and Breen prepared to play lawyers who most New Yorkers know from their ubiquitous marketing presence and advertising jingle.
What motivated you to turn this legal drama into a play about two lawyers?
It's more a comedy than a drama. My writing partner, Michael Breen, is from Buffalo, where Cellino & Barnes are based. He said everywhere he went, strangers at the bar—everyone—was talking about them breaking up. They're like hometown heroes. We started reading about the breakup, and it was just too juicy, too funny, not to write about.
The show's marketing material says it's “loosely based” on the dispute. How deep into it did you get? Were you poring through court documents?
All our research came pretty much from other news stories. I've read them all. We hit, I believe, a lot of the major plot points about their breakup, but we're taking a little nugget of fact and kind of blowing that out in silly, extreme places.
Have you seen Cellino or Barnes in the audience? Have you gotten legal threats?
No, none at all. When we started doing it, we saw a lot of people buying tickets were coming through the law firm, and we said, 'I hope they don't hit us with a cease-and-desist.' But when we performed for the first time in Brooklyn, several people from the firm came. When we did it in Buffalo, several of Cellino's family members came. They really loved it; they told us it was super funny.
Do you come down on the side of Cellino versus Barnes?
We keep it kind of open. When we started out, we tended toward Barnes being the villain. But they both tend toward extremes.
How did you develop these characters? Did you see them in court? Just from commercials?
We'd read in the paper that Cellino said, 'I'm gonna burn this place to the ground.' The character comes through. Someone who worked on their commercials reached out to us and said we nailed the personalities. I also watched a video of Barnes delivering a hyper-detailed speech on medical malpractice—he's just so intense and straightforward. The mannerisms are there, but the accent is more mine.
So do these characters complement each other, like Abbott and Costello?
They absolutely complement each other. Cellino is positioned as a more fun guy, and Barnes really wants to take over the world.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style, grammar and clarity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLabaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Delaware Presence
Litigation Leaders: Quinn Emanuel's Michael Carlinsky on Training Associates to Think and Act Like Trial Lawyers
Innovation Award Individual Finalist: Charlie Hernandez, My Pocket Lawyer
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
- 2Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 3Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 4K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 5'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250