Debt Collection Company Owners Agree to Pay $60M Under Settlement With NY AG
'Not only did they force unsuspecting debtors to pay more than they owed, but they illegally threatened to have them arrested for not complying with these predatory practices,' New York Attorney General Letitia James said. The debt collectors also agreed to leave the business.
July 25, 2019 at 03:22 PM
5 minute read
The owners of a handful of debt collection companies that operated partly in Western New York have agreed to leave the industry permanently and pay more than $60 million in restitution and penalties after their employees used illegal tactics to solicit more money from consumers.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought litigation against the companies, announced the settlement at a press conference in Buffalo, New York, on Thursday morning.
“Not only did they force unsuspecting debtors to pay more than they owed, but they illegally threatened to have them arrested for not complying with these predatory practices,” James said.
The debt collection company owners are Douglas MacKinnon and Mark Gray. MacKinnon owned Northern Resolution Group LLC and Enhanced Acquisitions LLC. Gray owned Delray Capital LLC.
MacKinnon was represented by Dennis Vacco, a former New York attorney general under Gov. George Pataki who's now a partner at Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman in Buffalo. Vacco declined to comment on the settlement.
Gray was represented by Joseph Makowski from the Makowski Law Office in Buffalo. Makowski said Gray did not admit any liability as part of the agreement.
“He's relieved to get this behind him and move on with his life,” Makowski said. “He's responsible for a family and he's satisfied to put this behind him.”
According to James, MacKinnon and Gray regularly allowed their debt collection companies to use a series of illegal tactics that caused consumers to pay more than they legally had to. In some cases, those consumers didn't owe anything at all, but still paid the company because they feared repercussions.
In one case, described by James, a debt collector employed by MacKinnon told a woman over the phone that her daughter owed money and would be brought to court if she didn't pay the full amount. The woman was schizophrenic, James said, and agreed to pay the full amount.
“She was so scared for her daughter that she sent the company a payment of $517 in order to prevent the company from taking her daughter to court,” James said.
That debt, according to James, was never verified.
That was a common theme among debt collectors employed by MacKinnon and Gray, James said. They would often call consumers and threaten them with legal action—and in some cases criminal charges—if they didn't pay the full amount.
They used a tactic called “spoofing” while making those claims, James said. That's when the caller makes it appear as if they're calling from a government agency or the court system. That was made worse by automated telephone dialers, which enabled collectors to send threatening messages to several people at once.
They also regularly did something called “overbiffing,” James said. That's when debt collection companies demand that consumers pay more than what they actually owe. That was on top of a common practice by the companies of automatically adding to a consumer's debt, for no legally justifiable reason, when it was placed with them for collection.
“This resulted in consumers who borrowed a few hundred dollars being hounded to pay thousands of dollars they did not legally owe,” James said.
MacKinnon closely monitored his collection shops and appeared to place pressure on their activity. If a stop wasn't collecting aggressively enough, James said, he would shut them down. Gray, according to James, regularly received complaints about the illegal tactics used by his own collection shops but didn't do anything to stop them.
Over the course of the scheme, more than 250 collection shops collected on debts acquired or controlled by MacKinnon and Gray. They placed debt with collection shops throughout the country, but most offices were in the Buffalo area.
The settlement requires MacKinnon to pay $60 million, two-thirds of which will be for restitution. The remaining $20 million will be a civil penalty, half of which will be paid to New York. The other $10 million will be paid to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal agency.
Gray was required to pay $6 million as part of the settlement, but that's been suspended because he doesn't have the money to finance the judgment, according to the Attorney General's Office. Gray will, instead, pay $10,000.
Both men, and their companies, are also permanently banned from operating in the debt collection industry under the agreement.
The Attorney General's Office did not bring criminal charges as part of the probe. James said she couldn't comment as to why the investigation didn't result in prosecution of either MacKinnon or Gray.
“I cannot comment on any criminal investigations,” James said. “Our focus was primarily on a civil action to recover restitution for consumers who, unfortunately, had been defrauded, and particularly with a focus on vulnerable seniors.”
The settlement is subject to court approval. The litigation is in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York.
READ MORE:
New York Enacts New Data Security Requirements to Protect Consumer Information
New York Expands Online Tool Connecting Crime Victims With Civil Legal Services
NY, NJ AGs Sue Feds Over IRS Rule That Curbs Deduction for Charitable Giving
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250