Debt Collection Company Owners Agree to Pay $60M Under Settlement With NY AG
'Not only did they force unsuspecting debtors to pay more than they owed, but they illegally threatened to have them arrested for not complying with these predatory practices,' New York Attorney General Letitia James said. The debt collectors also agreed to leave the business.
July 25, 2019 at 03:22 PM
5 minute read
The owners of a handful of debt collection companies that operated partly in Western New York have agreed to leave the industry permanently and pay more than $60 million in restitution and penalties after their employees used illegal tactics to solicit more money from consumers.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought litigation against the companies, announced the settlement at a press conference in Buffalo, New York, on Thursday morning.
“Not only did they force unsuspecting debtors to pay more than they owed, but they illegally threatened to have them arrested for not complying with these predatory practices,” James said.
The debt collection company owners are Douglas MacKinnon and Mark Gray. MacKinnon owned Northern Resolution Group LLC and Enhanced Acquisitions LLC. Gray owned Delray Capital LLC.
MacKinnon was represented by Dennis Vacco, a former New York attorney general under Gov. George Pataki who's now a partner at Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman in Buffalo. Vacco declined to comment on the settlement.
Gray was represented by Joseph Makowski from the Makowski Law Office in Buffalo. Makowski said Gray did not admit any liability as part of the agreement.
“He's relieved to get this behind him and move on with his life,” Makowski said. “He's responsible for a family and he's satisfied to put this behind him.”
According to James, MacKinnon and Gray regularly allowed their debt collection companies to use a series of illegal tactics that caused consumers to pay more than they legally had to. In some cases, those consumers didn't owe anything at all, but still paid the company because they feared repercussions.
In one case, described by James, a debt collector employed by MacKinnon told a woman over the phone that her daughter owed money and would be brought to court if she didn't pay the full amount. The woman was schizophrenic, James said, and agreed to pay the full amount.
“She was so scared for her daughter that she sent the company a payment of $517 in order to prevent the company from taking her daughter to court,” James said.
That debt, according to James, was never verified.
That was a common theme among debt collectors employed by MacKinnon and Gray, James said. They would often call consumers and threaten them with legal action—and in some cases criminal charges—if they didn't pay the full amount.
They used a tactic called “spoofing” while making those claims, James said. That's when the caller makes it appear as if they're calling from a government agency or the court system. That was made worse by automated telephone dialers, which enabled collectors to send threatening messages to several people at once.
They also regularly did something called “overbiffing,” James said. That's when debt collection companies demand that consumers pay more than what they actually owe. That was on top of a common practice by the companies of automatically adding to a consumer's debt, for no legally justifiable reason, when it was placed with them for collection.
“This resulted in consumers who borrowed a few hundred dollars being hounded to pay thousands of dollars they did not legally owe,” James said.
MacKinnon closely monitored his collection shops and appeared to place pressure on their activity. If a stop wasn't collecting aggressively enough, James said, he would shut them down. Gray, according to James, regularly received complaints about the illegal tactics used by his own collection shops but didn't do anything to stop them.
Over the course of the scheme, more than 250 collection shops collected on debts acquired or controlled by MacKinnon and Gray. They placed debt with collection shops throughout the country, but most offices were in the Buffalo area.
The settlement requires MacKinnon to pay $60 million, two-thirds of which will be for restitution. The remaining $20 million will be a civil penalty, half of which will be paid to New York. The other $10 million will be paid to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal agency.
Gray was required to pay $6 million as part of the settlement, but that's been suspended because he doesn't have the money to finance the judgment, according to the Attorney General's Office. Gray will, instead, pay $10,000.
Both men, and their companies, are also permanently banned from operating in the debt collection industry under the agreement.
The Attorney General's Office did not bring criminal charges as part of the probe. James said she couldn't comment as to why the investigation didn't result in prosecution of either MacKinnon or Gray.
“I cannot comment on any criminal investigations,” James said. “Our focus was primarily on a civil action to recover restitution for consumers who, unfortunately, had been defrauded, and particularly with a focus on vulnerable seniors.”
The settlement is subject to court approval. The litigation is in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250