Possible Suicide Attempt Unlikely to Slow Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Trafficking Case, Attorneys Say
Epstein's attorneys have filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which would review the trial court's bail denial under a "clear error" standard, a high bar for challenging a district court's factual findings.
July 25, 2019 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
A possible suicide attempt involving Jeffrey Epstein added a layer of complication to the financier's child sex-trafficking and conspiracy case, but attorneys said Thursday it likely would not slow the pace of proceedings, which appeared to be on a fast track toward trial.
Media reports Thursday morning indicated that Epstein, 66, had been found unconscious Tuesday in his cell at Metropolitan Correctional Center with marks on his neck. The reports cited unnamed law enforcement sources who said the physical injuries were not serious, but that prison officials were treating the incident as a possible suicide attempt.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons said Thursday that Epstein was housed at MCC, but declined to comment any further on the incident.
“As with all inmates, for privacy and security reasons, we do not share information on an inmate's medical status or their conditions of confinement,” the agency said.
The development came a week after U.S. Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York denied Epstein's bail request to be detained at his Upper East Side townhouse while he awaited trial.
Berman's July 18 decision, which found Epstein to be both a flight risk and a danger to the community, was seen as likely to place the case on the fast track to trial later this year, attorneys interview for this story said.
Typically, prosecutors and judges push cases along when a defendant has been remanded to federal custody, and there was little incentive for Epstein's attorneys to try to slow the proceedings with their client remanded to government custody. But news of Epstein's suspected suicide attempt, while jarring, was unlikely to alter that calculus, sources said.
“If anything, it could speed it up,” said Jaimie Nawaday, a former SDNY prosecutor and partner with Kelley Drye & Warren in Manhattan.
Nawaday said it's not uncommon for defendants to slip into a state of despair after an arrest and remand as the likelihood of a long incarceration begins to set in. From a health perspective, she said, the resources available to defendants pre-trial are more limited than they would be in prison following a conviction, and there would be little upside for the defense to ask for a delay in light of a suspected suicide attempt.
Charles Ross, a criminal defense attorney with Mintz & Gold, said that Epstein's team could potentially point to the incident as a reason for Berman to revisit last week's bail decision. The defense, he said, could argue that their client was suffering from severe psychological distress and in need of treatment in a secure setting, like the the home-prison they had proposed in their bail motion.
However, such an argument would not be likely to gain much traction with the judge, given his earlier findings, Ross said.
“I doubt an attempted suicide would factor into Berman changing his mind about denying bail,” he said.
Epstein's attorneys have filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which would review the bail denial under a “clear error” standard, a high bar for challenging a district court's factual findings.
According to media reports, Epstein was already being housed in a secure unit within MCC. Epstein's attorneys would have the option of asking Berman for a transfer to another facility, but Nawaday said such a request would come with its own set of complications.
“Then he has to endure transport every time he goes to court, depending on where he is,” she said.
In a transport situation, Epstein would be shuttled with other shackled defendants on their way to court dates, stopping at various locations along the way. Often, attorneys lose track of their client's whereabouts, and the ordeal can be traumatic for defendants.
“It's a pretty horrific experience,” Nawaday said. “If I had a client who's potentially suicidal, that's the last thing I would want for him.”
Epstein's attorneys are next expected in court for a status conference July 31 for motion scheduling and discovery issues.
Read More:
'Uncontrollable' Jeffrey Epstein Denied Bail Ahead of Sex Trafficking and Conspiracy Trial
SDNY Prosecutors Blast Epstein's Proposed Bail Conditions, Urge Pretrial Confinement
Epstein Attorneys Argue for Home Detention, Lay Out 14 Conditions for Release
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250