Possible Suicide Attempt Unlikely to Slow Jeffrey Epstein's Sex Trafficking Case, Attorneys Say
Epstein's attorneys have filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which would review the trial court's bail denial under a "clear error" standard, a high bar for challenging a district court's factual findings.
July 25, 2019 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
A possible suicide attempt involving Jeffrey Epstein added a layer of complication to the financier's child sex-trafficking and conspiracy case, but attorneys said Thursday it likely would not slow the pace of proceedings, which appeared to be on a fast track toward trial.
Media reports Thursday morning indicated that Epstein, 66, had been found unconscious Tuesday in his cell at Metropolitan Correctional Center with marks on his neck. The reports cited unnamed law enforcement sources who said the physical injuries were not serious, but that prison officials were treating the incident as a possible suicide attempt.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons said Thursday that Epstein was housed at MCC, but declined to comment any further on the incident.
“As with all inmates, for privacy and security reasons, we do not share information on an inmate's medical status or their conditions of confinement,” the agency said.
The development came a week after U.S. Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York denied Epstein's bail request to be detained at his Upper East Side townhouse while he awaited trial.
Berman's July 18 decision, which found Epstein to be both a flight risk and a danger to the community, was seen as likely to place the case on the fast track to trial later this year, attorneys interview for this story said.
Typically, prosecutors and judges push cases along when a defendant has been remanded to federal custody, and there was little incentive for Epstein's attorneys to try to slow the proceedings with their client remanded to government custody. But news of Epstein's suspected suicide attempt, while jarring, was unlikely to alter that calculus, sources said.
“If anything, it could speed it up,” said Jaimie Nawaday, a former SDNY prosecutor and partner with Kelley Drye & Warren in Manhattan.
Nawaday said it's not uncommon for defendants to slip into a state of despair after an arrest and remand as the likelihood of a long incarceration begins to set in. From a health perspective, she said, the resources available to defendants pre-trial are more limited than they would be in prison following a conviction, and there would be little upside for the defense to ask for a delay in light of a suspected suicide attempt.
Charles Ross, a criminal defense attorney with Mintz & Gold, said that Epstein's team could potentially point to the incident as a reason for Berman to revisit last week's bail decision. The defense, he said, could argue that their client was suffering from severe psychological distress and in need of treatment in a secure setting, like the the home-prison they had proposed in their bail motion.
However, such an argument would not be likely to gain much traction with the judge, given his earlier findings, Ross said.
“I doubt an attempted suicide would factor into Berman changing his mind about denying bail,” he said.
Epstein's attorneys have filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which would review the bail denial under a “clear error” standard, a high bar for challenging a district court's factual findings.
According to media reports, Epstein was already being housed in a secure unit within MCC. Epstein's attorneys would have the option of asking Berman for a transfer to another facility, but Nawaday said such a request would come with its own set of complications.
“Then he has to endure transport every time he goes to court, depending on where he is,” she said.
In a transport situation, Epstein would be shuttled with other shackled defendants on their way to court dates, stopping at various locations along the way. Often, attorneys lose track of their client's whereabouts, and the ordeal can be traumatic for defendants.
“It's a pretty horrific experience,” Nawaday said. “If I had a client who's potentially suicidal, that's the last thing I would want for him.”
Epstein's attorneys are next expected in court for a status conference July 31 for motion scheduling and discovery issues.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250