Littler Accused of Defamation by Ex-Partner of Pierce Bainbridge
Donald Lewis' new complaint seeks to hold Littler Mendelson and Putney Twombly liable for statements made in their representation of Pierce Bainbridge.
July 29, 2019 at 05:20 PM
3 minute read
Donald Lewis, the former partner of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht who is ensnared in litigation with the firm, is now suing Littler Mendelson and Putney Twombly Hall & Hirson for defamation, accusing them of supporting a campaign to smear him after he was fired.
In an amended complaint Friday, Lewis added Littler and Putney Twombly as defendants to his defamation complaint against Pierce Bainbridge. The two firms have served as outside counsel to Pierce Bainbridge. Lewis' amended complaint, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, seeks $45 million in total compensatory and punitive damages, along with other relief.
A spokeswoman for Littler said in an email, “We believe these allegations are without merit and plan to vigorously defend against them.” Michael Yim, a partner at Putney Twombly, declined to comment.
Pierce Bainbridge has said Lewis was fired after a staffer accused him of sexual assault and he violated the terms of his leave, but Lewis has said the firing was in retaliation for his criticism of partner John Pierce's financial shenanigans. Both sides sued one another.
In his amended suit on Friday, Lewis seeks to hold liable Littler, whose partner S. Jeanine Conley represented Pierce Bainbridge in presuit negotiations with Lewis and in its efforts to dismiss Lewis' suit, and Putney Twombly, whose partner Yim is described by Lewis as having spearheaded a sham investigation into the sex misconduct complaint against him. Lewis said he was suing the two firms and their two partners for their “direct and malicious participation” in Pierce Bainbridge's alleged campaign of defamation against him. He also added Pierce Bainbridge partner Caroline Beck to the latest version of the defamation complaint.
“Beck, Conley and Yim are well aware of Pierce's continued abuse of plaintiff, yet rather than take corrective ethical action, they have focused on aiding, abetting and facilitating the pathologically misguided Pierce Bainbridge war against plaintiff,” the new complaint states.
The amended complaint includes six claims: defamation, aiding and abetting defamation, violating the attorney-deceit law, New York Judiciary Law section 487, intentional infliction of emotional distress, aiding and abetting intentional infliction of emotional distress, and prima facie tort.
The amended complaint is the latest development in a bitter, multifront dispute. Lewis first sued Pierce Bainbridge and Putney Twombly in May after months of discussing a potential settlement, withdrew the suit on the same day in hopes of resolving the matter, only to be met by a suit in California state court by his former firm that accused him of extortion, among other things. Lewis refiled his complaint the next day, and the defendants have sought dismissal. Lewis filed his second suit, claiming defamation, in June against Pierce Bainbridge.
Pierce Bainbridge has said in statements and LinkedIn posts that Lewis was “credibly” accused of sexual assault by a staffer and was terminated for violating the terms of his suspension. Lewis has shot back with criticism of the internal investigation and claims that Pierce Bainbridge lied to Pravati Capital, a litigation funder that lent money to the firm.
Marc Mukasey, who represents Pierce Bainbridge, couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Trending Stories
- 1The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 2AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 3A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 4‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 5With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250