Littler Accused of Defamation by Ex-Partner of Pierce Bainbridge
Donald Lewis' new complaint seeks to hold Littler Mendelson and Putney Twombly liable for statements made in their representation of Pierce Bainbridge.
July 29, 2019 at 05:20 PM
3 minute read
Donald Lewis, the former partner of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht who is ensnared in litigation with the firm, is now suing Littler Mendelson and Putney Twombly Hall & Hirson for defamation, accusing them of supporting a campaign to smear him after he was fired.
In an amended complaint Friday, Lewis added Littler and Putney Twombly as defendants to his defamation complaint against Pierce Bainbridge. The two firms have served as outside counsel to Pierce Bainbridge. Lewis' amended complaint, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, seeks $45 million in total compensatory and punitive damages, along with other relief.
A spokeswoman for Littler said in an email, “We believe these allegations are without merit and plan to vigorously defend against them.” Michael Yim, a partner at Putney Twombly, declined to comment.
Pierce Bainbridge has said Lewis was fired after a staffer accused him of sexual assault and he violated the terms of his leave, but Lewis has said the firing was in retaliation for his criticism of partner John Pierce's financial shenanigans. Both sides sued one another.
In his amended suit on Friday, Lewis seeks to hold liable Littler, whose partner S. Jeanine Conley represented Pierce Bainbridge in presuit negotiations with Lewis and in its efforts to dismiss Lewis' suit, and Putney Twombly, whose partner Yim is described by Lewis as having spearheaded a sham investigation into the sex misconduct complaint against him. Lewis said he was suing the two firms and their two partners for their “direct and malicious participation” in Pierce Bainbridge's alleged campaign of defamation against him. He also added Pierce Bainbridge partner Caroline Beck to the latest version of the defamation complaint.
“Beck, Conley and Yim are well aware of Pierce's continued abuse of plaintiff, yet rather than take corrective ethical action, they have focused on aiding, abetting and facilitating the pathologically misguided Pierce Bainbridge war against plaintiff,” the new complaint states.
The amended complaint includes six claims: defamation, aiding and abetting defamation, violating the attorney-deceit law, New York Judiciary Law section 487, intentional infliction of emotional distress, aiding and abetting intentional infliction of emotional distress, and prima facie tort.
The amended complaint is the latest development in a bitter, multifront dispute. Lewis first sued Pierce Bainbridge and Putney Twombly in May after months of discussing a potential settlement, withdrew the suit on the same day in hopes of resolving the matter, only to be met by a suit in California state court by his former firm that accused him of extortion, among other things. Lewis refiled his complaint the next day, and the defendants have sought dismissal. Lewis filed his second suit, claiming defamation, in June against Pierce Bainbridge.
Pierce Bainbridge has said in statements and LinkedIn posts that Lewis was “credibly” accused of sexual assault by a staffer and was terminated for violating the terms of his suspension. Lewis has shot back with criticism of the internal investigation and claims that Pierce Bainbridge lied to Pravati Capital, a litigation funder that lent money to the firm.
Marc Mukasey, who represents Pierce Bainbridge, couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250