NY Marijuana Decriminalization Bill Is Signed Into Law by Cuomo
The measure was this year's compromise among Democrats in New York who couldn't coalesce around a measure to legalize the drug before the end of the legislative session in June.
July 29, 2019 at 12:35 PM
6 minute read
Possessing small amounts of marijuana will no longer appear on someone's criminal record in New York, and past offenders could have any record of that crime erased, after Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a bill to decriminalize the drug Monday morning.
The new law, which takes effect in late August, will reduce the charge for possessing less than two ounces of marijuana from a misdemeanor to a violation and lower fines that come with it.
It will also allow those convicted of possessing small amounts of the drug to have their records expunged, which criminal justice advocates have long called for as part of legalizing marijuana, Cuomo said the same in a statement on the law Monday.
“By providing individuals who have suffered the consequences of an unfair marijuana conviction with a path to have their records expunged and by reducing draconian penalties, we are taking a critical step forward in addressing a broken and discriminatory criminal justice process,” Cuomo said.
The measure was this year's compromise among Democrats in New York who couldn't coalesce around a measure to legalize the drug before the end of the legislative session in June. A bill floated to lawmakers that would have established regulations and a tax structure for marijuana was still met with concerns from hesitant Democrats, despite several amendments.
Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, said in a statement Monday that efforts to fully legalize the drug would start back up when lawmakers reconvene in Albany in January. The Senate didn't have the votes to pass the bill this year.
“Decriminalizing marijuana is an essential part of reforming our state's broken justice system. For too long, communities of color have been disproportionately targeted and negatively impacted,” Stewart-Cousins said. “The Senate Democratic Majority will continue our efforts for full legalization and regulation of marijuana, and today's decriminalization is a good first step.”
The part of the law that allows past offenders to have their convictions expunged won't apply automatically, said Steven Epstein, name partner at Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco in Nassau County.
Epstein said if someone is currently charged with possessing a small amount of marijuana, but hasn't been convicted, their case will automatically be dismissed. But if someone already has a conviction on those charges, they'll have to file a request to have their records expunged.
“The prior convictions—the convictions that were in effect prior to the effective date of the statute—my reading of the statute is that you're going to have to file a [request],” said Epstein, whose firm will be providing that service.
Once expunged, those convictions will no longer show up on a search of someone's criminal history. Possession of marijuana was previously a class B misdemeanor, depending on the amount of the drug.
“Decriminalizing marijuana and expunging records for those with low level offenses will go a long way towards helping our communities, and especially people of color, who have been devastated by them,” said Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx. “By removing the barriers and stigma that come with these records, we clear the path for many New Yorkers to find a job, housing and go on to live successful and productive lives.”
Fines for possession will also be reduced by the law. The fine for possessing less than an ounce of the drug will be capped at $50. The fine for possessing between one and two ounces of marijuana, or marijuana-related substances, will not exceed $200.
Those changes will take effect 30 days from Monday, according to the legislation.
Public defenders warned Monday after the bill was signed that, while decriminalization may be a step forward for criminal justice reform in regards to the drug, there will still be real consequences for individuals on parole or probation and undocumented immigrants found in possession of marijuana.
Emma Goodman, staff attorney with the Criminal Defense Practice's special litigation unit at The Legal Aid Society, said the bill won't address the disparate enforcement of marijuana possession laws in communities largely populated by people of color.
“Under this statute, for basic marijuana possession, our clients will continue to face parole and probation violations, continue to live in fear of immigration detention and deportation, and continue to be at risk of being separated from their family by an adult or child protective agency,” Goodman said.
Full legalization of the drug was met with opposition from several different fronts this year, after Democrats previously remained optimistic on the issue. Those involved with discussions on the measure said there were a host of different concerns that couldn't be resolved before they were scheduled to leave Albany for the year last month.
Chief among them, according to lawmakers, was where the tax revenue generated from sales of the drug would go. While many agreed those funds should be reinvested into communities disproportionately impacted by the state's drug laws, there was disagreement on the amount and how that would be decided.
Members of law enforcement, including prosecutors, were also concerned about road safety in the wake of marijuana legalization. There's currently no mainstream method to test how intoxicated someone is by marijuana during a traffic stop, and few officers in New York are trained on how to recognize when someone has used the drug.
At the same time, advocates for legalizing marijuana were concerned in the final days of this year's legislative session that the decriminalization bill signed Monday would stifle future efforts on the issue. Lawmakers have said they expect to continue discussions in January.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250