NY Financial Regulator Aiming to Set New Standards for Student Loan Servicers
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said the new regulation will help curb “unscrupulous practices” in the student loan servicing industry while putting New York ahead of federal officials on the issue.
July 31, 2019 at 04:50 PM
4 minute read
The New York State Department of Financial Services issued a new proposed regulation Wednesday that would set new standards for financial institutions that service student loans to better help consumers, the agency said.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said the new regulation will help curb “unscrupulous practices” in the student loan servicing industry while putting New York ahead of federal officials on the issue.
“While the federal administration ignores the growing problem of student loan debt, New York is taking action to protect borrowers,” Cuomo said. “This measure will help curb unscrupulous practices of the student loan servicing industry and empower borrowers to make better informed choices about how to finance their education.”
The new regulation comes after Cuomo and the state Legislature included a provision in this year's state budget, passed in March, that allows DFS to regulate and license student loan servicers that serve New York borrowers. The agency did not previously have that explicit power.
The Student Protection Unit at DFS, which was established in 2014, had received complaints about student loan servicers in New York in recent years and launched an investigation into the industry.
The unit found that many of the issues student loan borrowers face in New York are similar to what's been reported about the state's mortgage loan servicing industry in the past. Those include problems with how servicers handle borrowers' payments, a lack of information given to borrowers, and other issues.
The new regulation proposed Wednesday for student loan servicers seeks to address those issues. DFS Superintendent Linda Lacewell said the agency is looking forward to regulating the industry.
“New York's more than 2 million student loan borrowers, who are already bearing the enormous burden of debt, should not have to suffer abuse by student loan servicers after investing in their education,” Lacewell said. “We look forward to protecting New York students, their families and their futures under this new regulatory regime.”
Under the regulation, those companies would have to apply payments in a way that's in the best interest of borrowers, rather than in ways that maximize servicer fees. They would also have to provide clear and complete information to borrowers on fees, payments due, and the terms and conditions of loans.
Borrowers would be made aware of income-based repayment and loan forgiveness options under the proposed regulation. Companies will also be required to maintain a detailed history of a borrower's account and be able to provide it to them.
Student loan servicers would be required to respond to consumer complaints submitted by DFS within 15 days, according to the proposed regulation. They'll also have to provide accurate information to credit reporting agencies and ensure a smooth transition if a borrower transfers their loan to a new servicer.
The proposed regulation would also bar student loan servicers from misleading or defrauding borrowers in any way, or engaging in any unfair, deceptive, abusive, predatory act of practice. They would also be prohibited from misapplying borrowers' payments.
The regulation won't be finalized by DFS until after a 60-day public comment period, which started Wednesday.
Student loan servicers, under the law approved earlier this year, still have to apply for a license from the agency. That can be done through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System, DFS said.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250