Restaurant's $157M Malpractice Suit Against Seyfarth Can Proceed, Judge Says
A bankrupt restaurant company alleges the law firm failed to file expert reports and complete discovery in a timely manner, leading to $157 million in damages.
August 01, 2019 at 03:25 PM
3 minute read
Seyfarth Shaw has lost its bid to immediately dismiss a $157 million legal malpractice suit brought by a bankrupt restaurant company. A New York bankruptcy judge on Tuesday allowed the malpractice case to proceed.
Blue Dog at 399 Inc., which planned to open a restaurant at 399 Park Ave., filed for Chapter 11 in 2015 to prevent its landlord from repossessing its space. Seyfarth was eventually hired to represent Blue Dog in its suit against the landlord, a Boston Properties entity. Blue Dog alleges the law firm failed to file expert reports and complete discovery in a timely manner, leading key evidence to be excluded.
The restaurant, represented by Pittsburgh lawyer Scott Michael Hare, had an earlier adversary proceeding against Seyfarth thrown out. But the latest complaint was allowed to move forward Wednesday, with U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Wiles of the Southern District of New York referring to his statements at a hearing the day before. A transcript wasn’t immediately available.
The underlying landlord dispute, in which one of Blue Dog’s experts pegged its damages at $4.5 million, appears to have been settled last year for $300,000. Those funds, and the claim against Seyfarth, are more or less the estate’s only assets.
The restaurant pegs its damages in the malpractice case at a far greater amount than the landlord paid to settle. They rose, in Seyfarth’s telling, from a “groundless” $40.5 million in Blue Dog’s earlier adversary complaint to the “preposterous” sum of $157 million in its current iteration.
In its motion to dismiss the complaint, Seyfarth said it had managed to strike a deal with Boston Properties that would have allowed Blue Dog to move forward with its plans to run a restaurant. That deal fell through after Blue Dog’s owner, Elizabeth Slavutsky, backtracked, the firm said, and any potential damages are so tenuously related to its conduct that the suit shouldn’t have been allowed to advance.
Blue Dog’s lawyer said in its court papers that such arguments were premature, however. It said Seyfarth’s liability could be figured out at summary judgment.
James Peck, senior of counsel at Morrison & Foerster, who represents Seyfarth, declined to comment on the decision, as did Hare, Blue Dog’s attorney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All200 Hrs. of Partner Prep Guides Quinn Emanuel's Incredibly Detailed Mock Bankruptcy Trial
Davis Polk Capital Markets Attorney Heads to Morgan Lewis
NY Federal Judge Rules Online-Only Retailers Cannot Face ADA Claims
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250