Arnold & Porter, ACLU, NYCLU Reach Settlement on Attorney Fees in Census Case
They were expected to file a motion for attorney fees and costs associated with the litigation Friday, but wrote in a filing that they'd reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice instead.
August 02, 2019 at 06:09 PM
4 minute read
Law firm Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the New York Civil Liberties said in a filing late Friday that they’ve reached a settlement with the Trump administration over attorney fees and other costs related to litigation over a citizenship question on the 2020 U.S. Census.
They were expected to file a motion for attorney fees and costs associated with the litigation Friday, but wrote in a filing that they’d reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice instead.
“Plaintiffs … write to inform the Court that they have reached a settlement with Defendants resolving their claim for any fees, costs, and expenses relating to this action and therefore will not be filing a motion for fees or bill of costs today as previously contemplated,” the one-page filing said.
Attorneys involved in the case declined to provide details on the settlement Friday evening.
Arnold & Porter has been working with the ACLU and NYCLU since early last year to represent a coalition of immigrant rights groups in the litigation. They filed suit last June against the citizenship question.
They represented the New York Immigration Coalition, Casa de Maryland, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, ADC Research Institute, and Make the Road New York.
Their case quickly escalated over the past year, first being combined with a separate lawsuit from the New York Attorney General’s Office on the same matter for trial. That proceeding was before U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York in Manhattan.
Furman handed down several orders in the case that complicated the litigation, largely in favor of Arnold & Porter, the ACLU, and NYCLU. He allowed them to pursue extra-record discovery in the case last year, including a handful of depositions of officials within the Trump administration on the genesis of the question.
Their case culminated in a trial over the citizenship question in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District last November. Furman, in a decision handed down in January, blocked the Trump administration from asking about citizenship on the census. He was the first federal judge to do so.
The decision was appealed, and mostly leapfrogged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year. The high court said it was skeptical in its decision in June of the Trump administration’s reasoning for wanting to ask about citizenship on the census, and blocked the federal government from doing so.
Attorneys with Arnold & Porter have continued to be involved in the case as they, along with the ACLU and NYCLU, move to impose sanctions on the U.S. Department of Justice over the alleged false testimony of two witnesses about the origin of the citizenship question.
Attorneys from Arnold & Porter who are involved in the case include Ada Añon, Andrew Bauer, Sam Callahan, John Freedman, David Gersch, Peter Grossi, Daniel Jacobson, R. Stanton Jones, Caroline Kelly, Christine Lao-Scott, Chase Raines, Eric Rubel, Elisabeth Theodore, David Weiner, Robert Weiner, Barbara Wootton, and Dylan Young.
READ MORE:
Plaintiffs in Census Citizenship Litigation Move for Sanctions Against US DOJ
Trump Administration Denies False Testimony Claims in Census Lawsuit
Manhattan Federal Judge Rejects DOJ’s Request to Remove Census Case Attorneys
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250