AG James Joins Call to Remove Barriers to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder
The A.G.s targeted three federal-law “barriers … that we cannot change at the state level” that they say are preventing many health care providers from providing effective opioid-disorder treatments.
August 05, 2019 at 05:44 PM
4 minute read
New York Attorney General Letitia James joined 38 other state attorneys general Monday who together urged the U.S. Congress to remove three federal-law “barriers … that we cannot change at the state level” that they say are preventing many health care providers from providing effective opioid-disorder treatments.
In a letter to congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the 39 state A.G.s targeted “three significant barriers” to treating opioid use disorder, including a “cumbersome, out-of-date” federal privacy rule on patient treatment records; “unnecessary [federal] burdens” on the prescription of a key treatment drug; and a federal exclusion stopping state Medicaid programs from receiving certain reimbursements.
The detailed, three-page letter began by stating that the 39 state A.G.s “share [the U.S. Congress’] concern about the impact of the opioid epidemic on our country.” It moved to citing disturbing statistics about the epidemic, such as the crises resulting in more American deaths in two years than in the Vietnam War; more than half of the nation’s more than 70,000 drug overdose deaths in 2017 involving an opioid; and the impact of the crises being “so pervasive” that U.S. life expectancy has declined for three years in a row for the first time since the 1918 influenza pandemic.
“This loss of life and … major health consequences are matched by significant and continuing costs imposed on our criminal justice and social service systems,” the letter stated.
In addressing specific requests of Congress, the state A.G.s, including James, asked that applicable federal privacy rules found in 42 CFR Part 2 be replaced by “the effective and more familiar privacy rules” found in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
“The complexities of complying with 42 CFR Part 2 often prevent general practice providers from even attempting to treat patients with substance use disorders through the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT)”—which the A.G.s said is a “highly effective” approach combining medications with counseling and behavioral therapies—“because—while providers are familiar with how to comply with the privacy requirements of HIPAA—they may be intimidated by the requirements of 42 CFR Part 2.”
Next, the A.G.s asked that Congress pass H.R. 2482, the “Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act,” and “eliminate unnecessary burdens on buprenorphine prescribing” created by the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000).
“DATA 2000 was a step forward in substance use disorder treatment because it allowed the treatment of opioid use disorder in an office-based setting,” the state law enforcement leaders wrote. “However, it created a cumbersome bureaucratic system whereby providers who wish to prescribe buprenorphine in an office-based setting must prove to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) that they have taken special trainings and then apply to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for a special DEA ‘X’ number to indicate when buprenorphine is being prescribed to treat substance use disorder.”
“Buprenorphine should not be singled out from all other drugs because it is a treatment for substance use disorder,” they continued, adding that “in our effort to eliminate this antiquated policy that restricts a healthcare provider’s ability to prescribe buprenorphine, we are joined by a coalition of 22 states, led by the New York State Department of Health, seeking … this change.”
H.R. 2482 “would address this issue by eliminating the redundant and outdated requirement that practitioners apply for a separate waiver through the DEA to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of substance use disorder,” the A.G.s said.
Finally, the attorneys general asked that congress “fully repeal” the federal Institutions for Mental Diseases exclusion, which, they said, “generally prohibits state Medicaid programs from receiving federal reimbursement for adults between 21 and 65 receiving mental health or substance use disorder treatment in a residential treatment facility with more than 16 beds.”
“This arcane federal policy, while well intentioned at its inception to encourage treatment in community-based settings, has proven to detrimentally limit states’ ability to provide the full continuum of clinically appropriate care for Medicaid enrollees with a substance use disorder,” the A.G.s said.
Media relations representatives for House Speaker Pelosi did not respond to a request for comment. Media relations representatives for Senate Majority Leader McConnell could not be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Juries Can Use Slo-Mo to Evaluate Videos, NJ Justices Say
- 2An AI Danger to Minors: Two Texas Families Want to Shut Down Character.AI
- 3T14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
- 4$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
- 5Supreme Court Takes Up TikTok's Challenge to Upcoming Ban or Sale
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250