AG James Joins Call to Remove Barriers to Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder
The A.G.s targeted three federal-law “barriers … that we cannot change at the state level” that they say are preventing many health care providers from providing effective opioid-disorder treatments.
August 05, 2019 at 05:44 PM
4 minute read
New York Attorney General Letitia James joined 38 other state attorneys general Monday who together urged the U.S. Congress to remove three federal-law “barriers … that we cannot change at the state level” that they say are preventing many health care providers from providing effective opioid-disorder treatments.
In a letter to congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the 39 state A.G.s targeted “three significant barriers” to treating opioid use disorder, including a “cumbersome, out-of-date” federal privacy rule on patient treatment records; “unnecessary [federal] burdens” on the prescription of a key treatment drug; and a federal exclusion stopping state Medicaid programs from receiving certain reimbursements.
The detailed, three-page letter began by stating that the 39 state A.G.s “share [the U.S. Congress’] concern about the impact of the opioid epidemic on our country.” It moved to citing disturbing statistics about the epidemic, such as the crises resulting in more American deaths in two years than in the Vietnam War; more than half of the nation’s more than 70,000 drug overdose deaths in 2017 involving an opioid; and the impact of the crises being “so pervasive” that U.S. life expectancy has declined for three years in a row for the first time since the 1918 influenza pandemic.
“This loss of life and … major health consequences are matched by significant and continuing costs imposed on our criminal justice and social service systems,” the letter stated.
In addressing specific requests of Congress, the state A.G.s, including James, asked that applicable federal privacy rules found in 42 CFR Part 2 be replaced by “the effective and more familiar privacy rules” found in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
“The complexities of complying with 42 CFR Part 2 often prevent general practice providers from even attempting to treat patients with substance use disorders through the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT)”—which the A.G.s said is a “highly effective” approach combining medications with counseling and behavioral therapies—“because—while providers are familiar with how to comply with the privacy requirements of HIPAA—they may be intimidated by the requirements of 42 CFR Part 2.”
Next, the A.G.s asked that Congress pass H.R. 2482, the “Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act,” and “eliminate unnecessary burdens on buprenorphine prescribing” created by the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000).
“DATA 2000 was a step forward in substance use disorder treatment because it allowed the treatment of opioid use disorder in an office-based setting,” the state law enforcement leaders wrote. “However, it created a cumbersome bureaucratic system whereby providers who wish to prescribe buprenorphine in an office-based setting must prove to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) that they have taken special trainings and then apply to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for a special DEA ‘X’ number to indicate when buprenorphine is being prescribed to treat substance use disorder.”
“Buprenorphine should not be singled out from all other drugs because it is a treatment for substance use disorder,” they continued, adding that “in our effort to eliminate this antiquated policy that restricts a healthcare provider’s ability to prescribe buprenorphine, we are joined by a coalition of 22 states, led by the New York State Department of Health, seeking … this change.”
H.R. 2482 “would address this issue by eliminating the redundant and outdated requirement that practitioners apply for a separate waiver through the DEA to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of substance use disorder,” the A.G.s said.
Finally, the attorneys general asked that congress “fully repeal” the federal Institutions for Mental Diseases exclusion, which, they said, “generally prohibits state Medicaid programs from receiving federal reimbursement for adults between 21 and 65 receiving mental health or substance use disorder treatment in a residential treatment facility with more than 16 beds.”
“This arcane federal policy, while well intentioned at its inception to encourage treatment in community-based settings, has proven to detrimentally limit states’ ability to provide the full continuum of clinically appropriate care for Medicaid enrollees with a substance use disorder,” the A.G.s said.
Media relations representatives for House Speaker Pelosi did not respond to a request for comment. Media relations representatives for Senate Majority Leader McConnell could not be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250