Mail Bomber Cesar Sayoc Sentenced to 20 Years in Prison for Domestic Terror Acts
A Manhattan federal judge Monday sentenced convicted mail bomber Cesar Sayoc to 20 years in prison for sending 16 explosive devices to more than a dozen persons, including Democrats, journalists and critics of President Donald Trump.
August 05, 2019 at 04:43 PM
5 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge Monday sentenced convicted mail bomber Cesar Sayoc to 20 years in prison for sending 16 explosive devices to more than a dozen persons, including Democrats, journalists and critics of President Donald Trump.
Among those who were set to receive Sayoc’s devices were former President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the former presidential candidate and U.S. Secretary of State.
U.S. Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York declined to impose the life sentence that prosecutors sought in the case. Reading his sentence from the bench, Rakoff said it was the “lowest sentence I could reasonably give him.
“In the court’s view, it is no more and no less than he deserves,” Rakoff said.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, who attended Monday’s sentencing, in a statement that Sayoc had demonstrated “wanton disregard” for the safety of others and said his actions amounted to “domestic terrorism.”
“Cesar Sayoc assembled and mailed explosive devices to high-ranking officials and former elected leaders to incite fear and to terrorize his victims,” Berman said. “Though thankfully no one was hurt by his actions, Sayoc’s domestic terrorism challenged our nation’s cherished tradition of peaceful political discourse.”
Sayoc, who sat quietly at the defense table throughout the proceeding, expressed regret for his actions and began to weep out of relief as the sentence was handed down.
“I am beyond so very sorry for what I did,” he said earlier in the hearing.
Sayoc, 57, was arrested in October, just days after the first of the unexploded mail bombs was discovered at the New York home of George Soros, a hedge fund billionaire and prominent supporter of liberal causes. The following day a package intended for former Secretary of State Clinton in New York was intercepted. Packages sent to actor Robert De Niro; U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-California; and former Vice President Joe Biden, among a number of other individuals, would be discovered.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the bombs were packed inside of PVC pipes, along with shards of glass and pool chemicals to inflict maximal damage on anyone in their vicinity. However, the agency said the devices were incorrectly constructed and “would not have functioned as a result of their design.”
Still, an FBI report concluded, the bombs were “capable” of exploding, given the volatile mix of chemicals inside each device.
Sayoc pleaded guilty in March to 65 felony charges, including 16 counts of use of a weapon of mass destruction, which carries with it a maximum sentence of life in prison. As a part of his plea, Sayoc admitted in court that the packages were meant to do substantial harm to whoever opened them.
But just two days later, Sayoc told Rakoff in a letter that he had misspoke while giving his guilty plea and said that he had only intended to intimidate or scare his victims, not to actually harm anyone.
Arguing for a life sentence, prosecutors have rejected that claim and dismissed Sayoc’s statements that the devices were merely hoaxes. According to the government, the fact that the devices were flawed carried “little legal or practical import” when it came to sentencing.
“The defendant’s offenses are exceedingly serious,” prosecutors said last month in a 43-page sentencing memorandum.
“Put simply, the defendant intended to silence, through harm and fear, those with whom he disagreed, and now he must be incapacitated to protect the public and promote respect for the law.”
Sayoc’s lawyers, meanwhile, argued that their client came from a traumatic background, and suffered from “mental health and cognitive limitations,” which were exacerbated by excessive steroid use and his “infatuation” with Trump.
“In Mr. Sayoc’s mind, he was sending a hoax device, and he had no true grasp of the severity of his crimes or the potential ramifications of his actions. Now, nearly a year later, he understands how deeply wrong his actions were, and he is truly sorry for sending these packages,” wrote Ian Marcus Amelkin, an assistant federal defender in the Southern District.
Rakoff, however, dismissed Trump’s impact as a “side issue” and instead focused on Sayoc’s intent and background. in his sentencing decision, Rakoff said the crimes were “by any measure horrendous” but said it was a “conscious choice” not to inflict deadly force on his victims.
Sayoc would be almost 75 years old when he is eligible to be released based on good behavior, Rakoff said. His prison term would be followed by five years of probation.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250