Girls Face Disparate Treatment in Juvenile Justice System
Girls of color are 2.7 times more likely than their white counterparts to be referred to the legal system, 20 percent more likely to be formally petitioned and 1.2 times more likely to be detained than white girls.
August 09, 2019 at 12:53 PM
4 minute read
Girls constitute the largest growing segment of the juvenile justice system and now account for nearly one-third of all juvenile arrests in the United States. Disturbingly, girls in the juvenile justice system are treated differently than similarly situated boys, and girls of color are treated much differently than white girls.
The raw statistics that are beginning to emerge come as little surprise to those of us who have witnessed the disparate treatment of girls in general and girls of color in particular. The data mirror what we have suspected anecdotally and witnessed empirically for some time. Still, the facts are jarring, even for those of us “in the know:”
In 1980, girls accounted for roughly 11 percent of youth in the juvenile justice system nationally; now, the number is around 30 percent.
Girls of color are far more likely than white girls to be pushed out of the educational system and pushed into the juvenile legal system.
Girls of color are 2.7 times more likely than their white counterparts to be referred to the legal system, 20 percent more likely to be formally petitioned and 1.2 times more likely to be detained than white girls.
Once in the legal system, girls of color are much more likely to become deeply involved in the system—so confinement has greater long-term consequences.
Girls of color at 2.5 times more likely to be disciplined for disobedience, three times more likely to be disciplined for serious disruptive behavior (such as fighting and bullying) and twice as likely to be disciplined in school settings for minor violations compared to white girls.
Girls are four times as likely as boys to suffer sexual abuse in the juvenile legal system, and nearly twice as likely to experience complex trauma.
Data specific to New York State are spotty, in part because a child’s race information is not yet systemically collected and accessible. But research by Shabnam Javdani, PhD., an associate professor of applied psychology at New York University, clearly establishes that girls of color are grossly overrepresented in all processing points of the juvenile legal system and particularly likely to receive confinement.
Last October, the first gender-and-trauma-responsive court continuum in the state was launched in Westchester County after a three-year effort and partnership including the courts, the New York State Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children and several community-based organizations.
The “GRIP” (Gender Responsive Initiatives and Partnerships) Court is a dispositional court whose mission is to “promote healing and provide opportunities, justice and support that improve outcomes for girls, in particular for girls of color who are at risk or involved in the juvenile justice system.”
It pursues that mission by assigning sensitized judges who are eager to approach these cases holistically by including all the various stakeholders—the presentment agency, the attorney for the child, the probation department, social workers—and attempting to drill down, figure out what is going on in this girl’s life and understand how her different experiences and different background may require a different form of intervention to achieve the goal of enabling this child to become all that she wants to be and can be.
In the brief time the GRIP Court has been operating, we have seen a dramatic change in the girls. They are establishing trusting relationships with everyone on the team, from the judge to the court officer, and beginning to understand that we all care and we all have a stake in their success. Although this initiative remains quite new, it shows considerable promise, and we are hopeful that other regions will embrace a similar approach and deal head-on with twin demons of disparate treatment and disparate outcomes that we routinely see with girls in the juvenile legal system.
Kathie E. Davidson is the administrative judge for the Ninth Judicial District. Karen K. Peters, the retired presiding justice of the Appellate Division, Third Department, chairs the New York State Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/53/eb/cfc83eb0427cbf949fd645ca1306/joel-brandes-hp105-767x633.jpg)
Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
8 minute read![Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part Supporting Our Supreme Court Justices in the Guardianship Part](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/30/a1/b391557746f7a6422ddfa59135ab/gail-prudenti-767x633.jpg)
![A Time for Action: Attorneys Must Answer MLK's Call to Defend Bar Associations and Stand for DEI Initiatives in 2025 A Time for Action: Attorneys Must Answer MLK's Call to Defend Bar Associations and Stand for DEI Initiatives in 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/newyorklawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/03/LBJ-MLK-1966-A2133-10-767x633.jpg)
A Time for Action: Attorneys Must Answer MLK's Call to Defend Bar Associations and Stand for DEI Initiatives in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250