Sweeping Reform of NY Sexual Harassment Law Is Signed by Gov. Cuomo
The new law will, among other things, change the standard at which victims can allege sexual harassment and remove a tactic commonly used by employers to rebuff those claims.
August 12, 2019 at 01:03 PM
6 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Photo: Mark Reinstein/Shutterstock.com
Legislation to bolster protections for victims of sexual harassment in the workplace in New York and lower hurdles for those individuals to seek judicial recourse was signed into law by Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Monday.
The new law will, among other things, change the standard at which victims can allege sexual harassment and remove a tactic commonly used by employers to rebuff those claims.
The measure was the subject of two public hearings held earlier this year by the Legislature, which was first inspired by a group of former legislative staffers who’ve said they were victims of sexual harassment while working in state government.
It was the first time the Legislature held joint public hearings regarding the state’s laws on sexual harassment in the workplace in more than two decades.
State Sen. Alessandra Biaggi, D-Westchester, was an organizer of those hearings and later sponsored the bill signed into law by Cuomo on Monday. She gave a nod to the former staffers, who’ve organized themselves in recent years as the Sexual Harassment Working Group.
“In 2018 a group of former legislative staffers came forward to demand justice for the years of sexual harassment they endured at the hands of powerful lawmakers and state agencies—today we are taking that power and putting it in the hands of survivors and working people of New York,” Biaggi said.
The legislation was a priority this year for Biaggi, a freshman senator who won a primary last year against former Sen. Jeff Klein, D-Bronx, who was accused of sexually harassing a former staffer. Klein has denied the allegations.
That staffer, Erica Vladimer, later helped form the Sexual Harassment Working Group, which saw many of its priorities included in the legislation signed Monday. The group said in a statement that it will continue its push next year.
“Today, these protections are now available for millions of New York workers. Today, we celebrate and thank the workers who spoke out, the workers who could not speak out, and all of the workers who deserved better,” the group said. “Tomorrow, we plan 2020.”
Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas, D-Queens, who also sponsored the bill, said the new protections were long overdue. She worked with Biaggi and other lawmakers to plan this year’s hearings and later craft the bill, and she’s said more changes could come during next year’s legislative session.
“Every single person has the right to a workplace free of sexual harassment and violence,” Simotas said. “It has been a long time coming, and I am proud that the foundation upon which sexual harassment has festered in our workplaces for generations has been demolished.”
The new law will change the standard at which victims of sexual harassment can bring claims either in court or through a complaint filed with the state Division of Human Rights. Victims were previously held to a “severe or pervasive” standard, meaning the alleged behavior had to be one of the two to meet the burden of sexual harassment in New York.
A harasser could have previously been let off the hook, for example, if their behavior wasn’t considered severe or pervasive enough by a judge or the state to constitute a valid claim, regardless of the victim’s experience.
The new law doesn’t replace that standard with a new one. Instead, the statute says clearly that the severity or pervasiveness of the harassment is not relevant to a victim’s claim. Victims also won’t have to compare their experience to that of another employee to justify their claims.
It will also chip away at what’s called the Faragher-Ellerth defense, a tactic commonly used by employers to dismiss claims of sexual harassment.
The defense was articulated in two decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding workplace harassment. Those rulings, handed down more than two decades ago, found an employer is not liable for sexual harassment if it can show the employee didn’t follow the company’s policy for addressing those claims.
The new law will remove the Faragher-Ellerth defense as an affirmative defense for employers, meaning that it won’t be determinative for an employer’s liability if the worker doesn’t report a claim or follow the company’s policy. They’ll still be able to use the defense, but it will no longer be determinative.
Those two parts of the bill—removing the “severe or pervasive” standard and changing the Faragher-Ellerth defense—will take effect 60 days from Monday, according to the legislation.
“By ending the absurd legal standard that sexual harassment in the workplace needs to be ‘severe or pervasive’ and making it easier for workplace sexual harassment claims to be brought forward, we are sending a strong message that time is up on sexual harassment in the workplace and setting the standard of equality for women,” Cuomo said.
While the changes were spurred by reports of sexual harassment in the workplace and the #MeToo movement, the legislation will also expand the same protections for victims who are harassed because of any protected class in New York, like sexual orientation, race, disability and others.
It will also extend the amount of time victims have to pursue claims of sexual harassment through a complaint with the state Division of Human Rights. Victims previously only had a year to pursue those claims through the state agency. They’ll now have three years, which is the same amount of time victims have to pursue claims in court.
Nondisclosure agreements will be further weakened by the law. Those who enter into such an agreement will still be allowed to participate in an investigation into workplace harassment. Any nondisclosure clauses related to future claims of discrimination will also now be void unless a worker is notified that they can still talk to a reporting agency.
There are a slew of other provisions in the law as well, including a requirement for the state to study how further progress could be made to combat harassment in the workplace.
Miriam Clark, the president of the National Employment Lawyers Association/New York and an attorney with Ritz Clark & Ben-Asher LLP, cheered the measure in a statement Monday.
“The bill signed today represents a historic step forward for all workers in New York State, strengthening protections against all forms of illegal harassment and discrimination,” Clark said. “We are proud that with this legislation New York sets a national standard for the rights of workers to discrimination-free workplaces.”
READ MORE:
Sexual Harassment Laws to Change in NY Under Bill Passed by Legislature
Cuomo, Lawmakers Reach Agreement on Rape Statute, Sexual Harassment Laws
Cuomo Urges NY Lawmakers to Address Rape Statute, Sexual Harassment Before Leaving Albany
NY Lawmakers Seek Changes to Strengthen Sexual Harassment Laws
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze Judge in AGs' Suit Set to Block 'Chaotic' Trump Funding Freeze](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/07/3b/f5ca989c4c78b88ca04717405e37/us-district-court-district-of-rhode-island-767x633.jpg)
![Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/05/c1/4b31c175410eb4fb16ae25bb1b8c/bonta-james-platkin-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute read![Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/20/87/5a6699c749398b101be722b683c3/ap23032746325813-767x633.jpg)
Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute read![Bipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers Bipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/96/93/ef01c99e4bab98928cd1b2581977/54266754699-f929904b4b-o-767x633.jpg)
Bipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250