Upstate Town Justice Retires After Signing Arrest Warrant for Client's Husband
Jonathan D. Katz, who’s been on the bench for more than two decades, said in a phone interview Monday that the incident was an accident, but that it was time for him to retire.
August 12, 2019 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
A town justice in New Paltz, New York, who has also maintained a practice as a divorce attorney, has retired after the state Commission on Judicial Conduct accused him of signing an arrest warrant for a man, when he had also been retained as an attorney for the man’s wife.
Jonathan D. Katz, a two-decade veteran of the bench, said in a phone interview Monday that the incident was an accident, but that it was time for him to retire.
“I was not accused of doing it on purpose,” Katz said. “I think it’s recognized that it was an accidental error. As soon as it came to my attention, I recused myself from the case.”
Katz said, regardless of whether the action was intentional or not, judges are held to a high standard that he wanted to respect. He chose to leave the position, which was part-time, rather than litigate the issue with the commission.
He was represented in the matter by Timothy Murphy, an attorney from Saugerties, New York, in Ulster County.
A complaint sent to Katz and his attorney by the commission in February alleged two charges of judicial misconduct related to the incident. The first concerned the judicial action taken against his client’s husband, and the second was included because Katz continued to represent her after taking the judicial action.
Katz represented the woman in her divorce for nearly two years, during which his office made several filings at the trial court level, the complaint said. At one point, his client filed a complaint with the police alleging harassment charges against her husband.
The complaint was sent to the New Paltz Town Court, along with a request for an arrest warrant and “stay-away” order. About a week later, Katz signed an arrest warrant and temporary order of protection, according to the complaint. His client’s husband was later arrested, pursuant to the warrant signed by Katz, who said he did so accidentally.
Katz was retained to represent his client in the divorce in September 2016. The second charge said he continued to represent her until November 2018, even though he signed the arrest warrant for her husband in December 2017.
Robert Tembeckjian, the administrator of the commission, said the case represented a conflict of interest on the part of Katz.
“A judge must be and appear impartial if the public is to have confidence in the integrity of the courts,” Tembeckjian said. “It is an obvious and egregious conflict for a part-time judge to take action in a criminal case against the spouse of a client he is simultaneously representing in a related matrimonial matter.”
Katz resigned from office last week and agreed not to seek judicial office again. He had been a justice of the New Paltz Town Court since 1995 and made $29,355 in the part-time position, according to the commission.
Katz has his own practice focusing on divorce, family law, and traffic violations in New Paltz. He said he plans to continue in private practice.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250