Lawyer Who Represented Jeffrey Epstein's Sexual Abuse Victims Recalls Difficult Personality
"Even within his own law team, he felt he was smarter than them," said West Palm Beach attorney Spencer T. Kuvin, who represented three underage girls who claimed Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused them.
August 14, 2019 at 09:21 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein seemed to think he was the smartest man in the room and repeatedly corrected his own lawyers as he faced the early rounds of civil lawsuits by women accusing him of sexual abuse, according to a Florida lawyer involved in that litigation.
West Palm Beach attorney Spencer T. Kuvin sat across the room from Epstein’s counsel more than a decade ago, representing three of the more than two dozen women who brought civil complaints against Epstein between 2008 and 2009.
What he saw was a complex character, who seemed at once charming and off-putting, according to Kuvin, litigation director of the Law Office of Craig Goldenfarb.
“Whenever [Esptein's] lawyers would try to discuss the case, he would always try to interject, and he would even correct his own lawyers,” Kuvin said. “Even within his own law team, he felt he was smarter than them.”
Robert D. Critton Jr. of Critton, Luttier & Coleman in West Palm Beach served as one of Epstein’s local attorneys at that time. He did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Another of Epstein’s lawyers, Michael J. Pike of Pike & Lustig in Miami, was opposing counsel against Kuvin. Pike declined to discuss his impressions of Epstein, saying that attorney-client privilege survived, even after his former client’s death.
But according to Kuvin, Epstein exuded an air of superiority. Although Epstein was quiet, Kuvin said, preferring to sit back and listen to conversations, he’d regularly jump into conversations among the attorneys.
To Kuvin, it seemed the wealth manager-turned-convicted sex offender wanted “everyone to be his friend,” and would brag about the high-profile people in his social circle, including scholars and university professors.
“He was always pleasant in demeanor and had a friendly type of personality,” Kuvin said. “That was never the issue. And I think he was a smart individual. I don’t think he was as smart as he thought he was, but he was very pleasant, very quiet, very soft-spoken, and he would always try to smile and be friendly with people.”
That said, Kuvin said he also got the impression that Epstein was a “creepy individual,” who allegedly tied to befriend and curry favor with his alleged victims.
The lawsuits, which settled, alleged Epstein had sexually assaulted and abused underage girls. They came after Epstein, a financier who has homes in Manhattan and South Florida, pleaded guilty in Florida in 2008 to procuring a minor for prostitution and felony solicitation of prostitution.
Epstein served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail and was later placed on work release as part of a now-infamous plea deal. At the time of his death, Epstein was on trial in New York on charges of child sex trafficking and conspiracy.
One of Kuvin’s former clients was among the first accusers to come forward, prompting Palm Beach County police to investigate Epstein. This led to Kuvin being among the first attorneys to take Epstein’s deposition.
It was the quickest deposition of Kuvin’s career.
The brief exchange ending abruptly in response to Kuvin’s question about whether Epstein’s penis was oval-shaped, as one alleged victim had claimed.
“It lasted all of a minute,” Kuvin said. “[Epstein] got up and walked out, and the judge sanctioned him $800 and made him return.”
Epstein faced both criminal charges and civil litigation at the time of his death. He’d already settled cases in state and federal court in Florida years earlier for undisclosed sums, and attorneys were pressing ahead with new actions.
Epstein had more than $500 million in assets when he was arrested, according to prosecutors, which could become vulnerable to lawsuits in the coming months.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250