Allegations of Waiter Harassment at Sparks Steak House Renewed in Federal Suit
The lawsuit points to the steakhouse’s 2012 settlement in a larger male-on-male harassment case lodged against it by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the action, filed by a former waiter who is gay, claims that not all of the settlement's terms have been followed.
August 15, 2019 at 07:05 PM
5 minute read
A former waiter at Manhattan’s famed Sparks Steak House has launched a sexual orientation discrimination and religious discrimination lawsuit against the restaurant, alleging that a sexually harassing former co-worker even threatened to “kill him outside” and that waiters of the Islamic faith were given preferential treatment over him.
The lawsuit, brought by former Sparks waiter Yavor Ivanov, who is gay, also points to the steakhouse’s 2012 settlement in a larger male-on-male harassment case lodged against it by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. And his 20-page complaint then claims that Sparks, years later, has not complied with certain binding requirements under the settlement, including reporting all sexual harassment or retaliation claims made by employees to the EEOC, and having a notice publicly posted about the 2012 settlement.
“For too long, [Sparks] … has had issues with how it responds to harassment allegations by Sparks Steakhouse employees,” the complaint states in the first paragraph of its factual recitation.
No counsel for Sparks Steak House could be reached for comment Thursday.
The EEOC also could not be reached for comment.
The lawsuit—filed in Manhattan federal court Monday and alleging federal Title VII discrimination claims, as well as state and New York City human rights law claims—outlines what it says was 3 1/2 years of hostile work environment discrimination and other discriminatory acts perpetrated against Ivanov, including him being called a “faggot” and “sweetie” repeatedly, and being asked almost daily by a harassing waiter, “How do you like it?” and “Where do you take it?”
The suit further claims that many of the repeated and ultimately mentally damaging acts against Ivanov came at him from certain employees of the Islamic faith, and that, as part of the mistreatment, a former head server at Sparks made comments about his sexuality in Arabic.
“Mr. Yavor Ivanov is a 33-year-old homosexual male who does not practice Islam,” the 20-page complaint also notes.
Ivanov and his lawyer, Mark Shirian, also bring a retaliation legal claim in the suit, alleging, for instance, that after Ivanov complained about harassment he faced almost daily—and after no corrective action was taken—his supervisors then “overworked [him] by overseating his shifts.”
Ultimately, the complaint claims, Ivanov constructively discharged himself in October 2018, which was about six months after he allegedly was taken by ambulance to a hospital after getting “dizzy from [an] insult and experience[ing] a severe blood pressure uptick that [led] to an anxiety and panic attack as a result of the overall harassment and discrimination he had endured.”
But the sexual orientation and religious discrimination the waiter went through, says his complaint, began almost from the day he started at Sparks—which has been an institution in Manhattan for decades, and where famously in 1985 the reported mob-linked killing of Gambino crime boss Paul Castellano happened outside its doors.
“The acts of discrimination forming the basis of this complaint began in early December 2014, the first month of Mr. Ivanov’s employment and continued throughout June 2018. Mr. Ivanov was the victim of uninitiated, unprovoked, and harassing comments other employees,” the actions states.
Later, the complaint alleges that in 2015 “Sayed, a former head sever, became a Sparks manager and attempted to fire Mr. Ivanov a week after he was hired upon finding out that Mr. Ivanov is gay,” but that Ivanov was then rehired by a Sparks general manager.
In another example of the claimed harassment, the complaint says that “Majid Alami (‘Mr. Alami’), a Moroccan waiter of Islamic faith, bullied Mr. Ivanov for being gay, by calling Mr. Ivanov ‘a fucking faggot’ and threatened that he would ‘kill him outside.’”
The lawsuit claims “while Mr. Ivanov was overworked with many tables, the waiters of Islamic faith took prolonged breaks and the sections assigned to them would be empty.”
“Specifically,” the complaint continues, “the waiters who practice Islam took breaks on Ramadan for an hour each day for a month,” and that “the waiters who were friendly with management would not get seated as much, so the Islamic waiters in essence worked less but still shared the same amount in tips because of a pool system where the waiters would evenly split the tips for each night.”
The lawsuit names as the defendant Michael Cetta Inc. d/b/a Sparks Steak House, and it requests relief that includes compensatory damages, punitive damages and an order that Sparks institute policies to eradicate unlawful practices.
The EEOC’s 2012 settlement with Sparks resolved an action in which the agency charged that restaurant managers sexually harassed 22 male waiters over an almost eight-year period. In addition to agreeing to institute certain actions aimed at eradicating any possible harassment or retaliation, Sparks also agreed to pay $600,000 to settle the charges. Sparks, which was represented by Allan Taffet and Chad Naso of Duval & Stachenfeld in that EEOC matter, denied the allegations that were made and did not admit to wrongdoing or liability.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250