At NYC Bar, Cuomo Proposes New Domestic Terrorism Charge in NY State Law
“These are American citizens who are radicalized, not by a foreign ideology, but rather radicalized by hate for other Americans,” Cuomo said. “But that is sill terrorism.”
August 15, 2019 at 03:09 PM
6 minute read
Speaking at the New York City Bar Association headquarters in Manhattan, Gov. Andrew Cuomo provided more details on a proposal to add a new crime of domestic terrorism to the state’s penal law in response to the recent mass shooting in El Paso, Texas.
Cuomo decried the shooting, which the police said targeted Mexicans last week, as a “mass hate crime,” which he now wants to define in state law as an act of domestic terrorism.
“These are American citizens who are radicalized, not by a foreign ideology, but rather radicalized by hate for other Americans,” Cuomo said. “But that is sill terrorism.”
The proposal, if enacted, would make New York the first state in the country to redefine domestic terrorism as a crime in state law as described by Cuomo. He criticized federal lawmakers, including President Donald Trump, for not taking similar measures after the nation’s most recent mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton, Ohio.
“If the federal government won’t act, or if the federal government can’t act, New York state will,” Cuomo said. “We must begin by recognizing the crisis for what it is because you will never solve a problem in life that you are unwilling to admit.”
Cuomo first proposed the new law, which he’s calling the Hate Crimes Domestic Terrorism Act, during a radio interview Wednesday, but little details were known at the time. During his remarks at the City Bar on Thursday, he expanded on the idea.
The new law would criminalize, as domestic terrorism, a mass casualty committed in New York where the motive is based on someone’s race, religion, creed or sexual orientation. The penalty for the crime would be a maximum sentence of life without parole, Cuomo said.
“Mass hate crimes are terrorism, and the punishment should fit the crime,” Cuomo said.
Under the proposal, a mass casualty would be defined as any incident, motivated by hate, that results in the murder of at least one person and the attempted murder of at least two people, according to Cuomo’s office.
The bill would also create a task force to study mass shootings and recommended practices to prevent potential mass shootings. The task force would also recommend security practices for locations likely to be targeted by mass shooters. Those findings would be submitted to the governor and the Legislature.
In a statement released by Cuomo’s office after his remarks, the leaders of the Legislature said they intend to work on the proposal with the governor’s office in the future. Neither explicitly offered support for Cuomo’s proposal as outlined Thursday, but said they would collaborate on a final version.
“Our diversity is our strength, and we will work with the Senate and the Governor to create effective laws to ensure the safety of all New Yorkers,” said Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx.
“The Senate Democratic Majority has worked hard to protect and expand New Yorkers’ rights, and ensure all residents of our state feel safe and welcome,” said Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester. “We look forward to working with both the Governor and the Speaker to advance these important goals.”
Bret Parker, the executive director of the New York City Bar Association, applauded Cuomo’s remarks in a statement released Thursday afternoon.
“We have called on our elected officials to acknowledge the link between hateful rhetoric and identity-based violence, and we applaud the Governor for his efforts in tackling this issue to make our communities safer,” Parker said.
Terrorism is already punishable under state law, but it isn’t defined as specifically as Cuomo’s proposal. The current crime of terrorism is a Class A felony, the highest degree in New York. Considering Cuomo’s suggested sentence, the new crime would be the same.
Cuomo also challenged federal lawmakers to enact a series of new gun-control measures, including universal background checks for gun purchases and a ban on high-capacity magazines and assault-style weapons. The U.S. House of Representatives has already approved the first measure, on which the Senate has not taken a vote.
Without mentioning the president’s name, Cuomo largely blamed him, and other Republicans, for the recent mass shootings, which he said were the result of a “toxic cocktail of guns and hate.”
“Hate can pick up a rock or a club and shatter a life, but we are facing the lethal combination of hate and guns,” Cuomo said. “The President knows the obvious truth. If there is no gun, there is no trigger.”
New York enacted its own sweeping set of gun control reforms in 2013, after the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. Dubbed the SAFE Act, the measure required universal background checks, created a mental health database, and banned assault-style weapons, among other provisions.
The Legislature took another step toward further gun control laws this year when it passed a bill that will allow judges to temporarily bar someone from owning or buying a gun, based on concerns that they could hurt themselves or others. That decision is subject to judicial review.
If lawmakers want to act on Cuomo’s new proposal, it likely won’t happen until January at the earliest. That’s when next year’s legislative session is scheduled to begin. They could come back for a special session in the meantime, but that’s rarely happened in recent history.
Neither legislative leader indicated in their statement sent by Cuomo’s office that they would return to Albany immediately to act on the proposal.
READ MORE:
Sweeping Reform of NY Sexual Harassment Law Is Signed by Gov. Cuomo
Cuomo Signs Bill Barring Job Bias Based on Religious Attire, Facial Hair
NRA Could Obtain Internal State Documents in Lawsuit Against Cuomo, DFS After US Judge’s Review
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250