Attorneys Sue to Secure Body Cam Footage in Fatal Shooting of Mentally Ill Woman
A team of lawyers has sued the New York Police Department in an effort to secure body-camera footage from the fatal shooting of a mentally ill woman last year in Queens, saying video and audio from the incident would shed light on police interactions with people undergoing mental health crises.
August 19, 2019 at 02:41 PM
4 minute read
A team of lawyers has sued the New York Police Department in an effort to secure body-camera footage from the fatal shooting of a mentally ill woman last year in Queens, saying video and audio from the incident would shed light on police interactions with people undergoing mental health crises.
New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, along with pro bono counsel from Milbank, filed the lawsuit in Manhattan Supreme Court on Friday, after the NYPD declined to turn over footage of the deadly encounter involving 54-year-old Susan Muller in her home last September.
In an 18-page filing, the group said NYPD was obligated to produce 911 calls and unedited video and audio files under New York’s Freedom of Information Law, but instead issued a “blanket denial,” without explaining why it wasn’t eligible for public release. According to the lawsuit, the NYPD said it did not plan to revisit its decision, and “due to several pending investigations, the records are exempt from disclosure in their entirety.”
“The NYPD’s refusal to release any record of this controversial encounter keeps valuable records shrouded by a cloak of secrecy that undermines the purposes that both FOIL and the NYPD’s [body-worn camera] program serve: namely, fostering transparency and accountability between the government and the public,” attorneys for the group wrote in the complaint.
“As interactions between police officers and the public, particularly those resulting in the use of deadly force, have featured prominently in our local and national conversation, the public’s right to access contemporaneous records has never been more paramount,” the lawsuit said.
The NYPD said Monday that an “internal investigation into is matter is still active and we do not comment on pending litigation.”
According to the filing, police shot Muller three times within 50 seconds of responding to her call reporting that a woman with a knife had broken into her home. The attorneys said police had responded to similar calls at Muller’s home nine times since 2000 and were aware of he history of mental health issues.
The day of the shooting, the complaint said, Muller had been unable to fill her antidepressant prescription, had used alcohol, and was acting erratically. Police accounts of the incident indicated that Muller met officers at her front door and identified herself as the 911 caller. A search of the home, however, found no signs of a burglary.
When police asked her if she had actually seen an intruder, Muller allegedly approached an officer with a kitchen knife and was shot three times in the torso, the NYPD said. She was pronounced dead at the scene.
The lawsuit comes as NYPD interactions with mentally ill people are on the rise. According to the filing, 14 individuals with mental illness were killed by the police between March 2016 and March 2019, and training for situations involving the mentally ill have reached far fewer officers than intended.
It also comes after the NYLPI successfully petitioned a New York State Supreme Court judge to order the release of unredacted body-camera footage of the fatal police shooting of Miguel Richards, another person who had been experiencing mental health crisis when he was killed by police in 2017.
“We should not have to take the NYPD to court repeatedly to confirm the public’s right under New York’s Freedom of Information Law to view body-worn camera footage of tragic incidents where people with disabilities who call 911 are shot by police officers,” said Ruth Lowenkron, director of the Disability Justice Program at NYLPI. “How many more New Yorkers need to die before we reform the way we handle mental health crises?”
The NYLPI is represented by Lowenkron and Stuart Parker. Jed M. Schwartz, Benjamin J. Reed and Marion C. Burke of Milbank are also acting as counsel in the case.
The case is captioned New York Lawyers for the Public Interest v. New York City Police Department.
Read More:
NY DAs Ask Cuomo to Fund More Videotaped Interrogations, Body Cameras
Judge Orders NYPD Study Requiring Officers to Use Body Cameras Earlier in Encounters
Attorneys Sue NYPD for Body Cam Footage From Fatal Shooting of Mentally Disturbed Man
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250