Michael Avenatti Says Case Over Alleged Theft From Stormy Daniels Belongs in California
Defense counsel for Avenatti argued that the case was "virtually identical" to a case in the Central District of California, where he was indicted in April on 36 counts of misappropriating funds from five clients.
August 23, 2019 at 05:24 PM
4 minute read
An attorney for Michael Avenatti this week told a Manhattan federal judge that a criminal case accusing the embattled lawyer of stealing $300,000 from his former client, adult film star Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels, belonged in a California federal court, where prosecutors said they were prepared to try the charges as a part of a sprawling wire fraud case.
In a motion filed Thursday and docketed Friday, H. Dean Steward argued that the case against his client was "virtually identical" to a case in the Central District of California, where Avenatti was indicted in April on 36 counts of misappropriating funds from five clients.
One month later, Avenatti was charged in the Southern District of New York with diverting two payments of $150,000 from an advance on a book deal being paid to Clifford.
"Both indictments allege that Mr. Avenatti received funds related to the settlement of cases on behalf of clients, did not timely remit the full share of the settlement amount owed to his clients, and then lulled clients into believing that the settlement funds had not yet been received," Steward said in the Rule 21 transfer motion.
"There is no principled reason that these cases—which both include claims for wire fraud, which both allege misconduct by Mr. Avenatti in the Central District of California, and which will undoubtedly share many of the same issues, documents, and witnesses—should be tried in different federal districts," he said.
In the Southern District, prosecutors have alleged that Avenatti, an outspoken attorney known for his criticisms of President Donald Trump, had forged Clifford's name on a letter to her literary agent and instructed the payments to be sent to a bank account under his own control. The government said that Clifford did not know about the other bank account and that half of the diverted sum had never been repaid.
According to the indictment, Avenatti had used the funds for a range of personal and professional purposes unrelated to his client, including paying employees of his law firm and coffee business and to pay for flights, hotels and dry cleaning. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The California case accuses Avenatti of 36 counts of tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud and other charges in connection with the alleged theft from former clients. In particular, he faces 10 counts of wire fraud for pocketing millions of dollars from more than $12 million he received during the past five years as part of four settlements, including one on behalf of a paraplegic client.
In addition to embezzling clients, the charges also include 19 counts of failing to file income tax returns, both personal and on behalf of his businesses, including his law firms, Avenatti & Associates and Eagan Avenatti, which filed for bankruptcy in 2017. The charges also include four counts of bankruptcy fraud against Avenatti for concealing assets, including $1.36 million in attorney fees from a settlement of litigation brought by ticket holders of the 2011 Super Bowl.
If convicted in that case, he faces 333 years in federal prison, plus two more years of a mandatory consecutive sentence on an aggravated identity theft count related to the bank fraud allegations.
Steward said in the motion that the case involving Clifford could have been filed in California, where most of the evidence and witnesses reside. The filing also cited a statement from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Los Angeles that said, if the motion were granted, prosecutors there would be "prepared to try the charges pending in the SDNY Fraud Case either in a consolidated proceeding with the current charges or immediately after the trial in this case."
Prosecutors in the Southern District have resisted the transfer motion, arguing that the case belongs in Manhattan.
In New York, Avenatti also stands charged in a separate case of trying to extort athletic apparel giant Nike Inc. by threatening to go public with supposedly damaging information if the company didn't pay him up to $25 million. Trial in that case is currently set to begin in November.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250