NY Gov. Cuomo Signs Measure to Curb Creditors' Abuse of Confessions of Judgment
The bill was sent to the Legislature this year at the request of the state Office of Court Administration, which has seen an uptick in creditors using the state's courts for that purpose.
August 30, 2019 at 01:55 PM
5 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo approved legislation Friday that will limit the use in state courts of so-called confessions of judgment, which previously allowed creditors to both freeze and seize a borrower's assets, without any litigation, by filing an affidavit in a New York state court.
The practice allowed creditors to file a judgment in New York to seize those funds, even if the borrower lived elsewhere.
The bill was sent to the Legislature this year at the request of the state Office of Court Administration, which has seen an uptick in creditors using the state's courts for that purpose.
"We are looking to correct the abuse of confessions of judgment within the state," said Lucian Chalfen, an OCA spokesman. "The overarching aim is to prevent creditors from abusing confessions of judgment by using New York courts as a venue to profit from debtors with no New York connection."
It was a priority for State Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, who was chosen to chair the Judiciary Committee in his chamber this year. He decried the practice in a statement celebrating the new law Friday.
"Where there's a loophole, there's a bad actor willing to exploit it to make money, no matter the cost to ordinary Americans," Hoylman said. "The entire business model of lenders who exploited New York's court system and laws to prey on out-of-state small businesses through confessions of judgment was immoral."
Confessions of judgment are usually included in an application for a loan, and contain language that allows a creditor to enter a judgment in court in lieu of litigation when a borrower misses a payment. They essentially give up their right to defend the seizure.
Until the legislation was signed Friday, creditors were able to use state courts in New York to execute confessions of judgment against a borrower — even if both entities are out-of-state — and freeze and seize their assets.
The new law will only allow confessions of judgment to be entered in the state's courts if the affidavit for such an agreement was executed in New York. A creditor will only be allowed to file a confession of judgment in the county where the borrower lived at the time.
That would apply to both in-state borrowers, and those who made the agreement in New York but have since moved. If the affidavit involves a nonnatural person, like a corporation, that entity would be considered to reside in the county where it has its principal place of business, according to the law.
Government agencies, which typically use confessions of judgment to ensure they can recover assets during a prosecution or civil case, would still be allowed to enter such judgments in any county of the state.
The law was sent to the Legislature in response to a news report from Bloomberg last year that highlighted how some creditors have used state law in New York to pursue confessions of judgment against borrowers across the country.
According to an analysis by Bloomberg of data from the state court system, judgments of confession in favor of creditors spiked from just 14 cases before 2014 to more than 3,500 in the third quarter of last year. The report was published in November 2018.
Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, D-Bronx, who chairs the Judiciary Committee in the lower chamber, gave Bloomberg a shoutout in a statement on the new law Friday.
"For too long, New York has been used as a property seizure mill for the entire country because of loopholes in our laws governing confessions of judgment," Dinowitz said. "Thanks in no small part to a diligent journalist at Bloomberg News, we were able to identify and correct this problem so that our civil courts will be able to focus on protecting the rights of New Yorkers—not expediting corporate greed from around the country."
Confessions of judgment do have a practical purpose in the lending industry. They can be used by creditors to seize the assets of someone who hasn't lived up to the agreement of their financing, and when there's no other alternative for the creditor to recoup their investment.
The new law takes effect immediately and will apply to judgments by confession filed on or after Friday, according to the legislation.
"By closing this loophole, we are strengthening our state's legal system and helping to ensure both in-state and out-of-state borrowers will not fall victim to these opportunistic schemes," Cuomo said.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250