Spending on Training Makes In-House Legal Departments More Cost-Effective, Survey Says
The most cost-effective legal departments made efforts to continuously strengthen their in-house capabilities, the survey found, and invested more in lawyer training and development.
September 05, 2019 at 05:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Photo: Bigstock
A Gartner Inc. survey of 140 in-house legal departments found that the most cost-effective departments devoted almost twice as much of their budgets to training as their higher-cost peers.
The most cost-effective legal departments spent 2.04% of their in-house budget on training and development compared to higher-cost departments that spent only 1.04% on training. The researchers concluded that investing in training helped increase productivity while not increasing head count and led to a decrease in spending on expert or outside support.
The most cost-effective departments made efforts to continuously strengthen their in-house capabilities and invested more in lawyer training and development. They also assigned more work in-house and standardized work processes using tools and templates, the survey found.
The 2018 Gartner State of the Legal Function survey examined features of cost-effective legal departments whose spending was in the lowest quartile of their peer group "while managing a similar volume and portfolio of work," to the higher-cost departments, the research group said in a news release.
The survey found that cost-effective departments also devoted nearly 8% more of their total budgets to in-house staff salaries, training, information technology systems and software compared with higher-cost departments.
Michael Mayfield, research director in Gartner's legal and compliance practice, said in a statement, "legal departments have a tendency to hand off complex work to outside counsel, but organizations can achieve significant cost savings by bringing this work in house."
The most cost-effective legal departments spent 54.9% of their legal budget in-house, compared to 47.2% for higher-cost department.
Gartner found that 63% of in-house legal work is routine or can be standardized and that cost-effective legal departments "employ a high level of standardization" by creating self-service tools for business clients and using templates for routine matters.
Law firm expenses made up 93.5% of a legal department's outside spending, according to Gartner, a publicly traded research and advisory company. Cost-effective departments used outside counsel mainly for critical matters, while relying on alternative legal service providers and non-lawyer staff for less risky activities, the survey found.
Cost-effective legal departments spent more than 6% of outside dollars on alternative legal service providers, compared with the higher-cost legal departments, who spent less than 2% on alternative providers.
Lower-cost legal departments used an average of 14 outside firms versus 31 for the higher-cost legal departments, which researchers said lowers the amount of resources needed to manage the outside law firms.
But James Wilber, a principal of Altman Weil Inc., a management consulting firm to legal organizations, said in an interview Thursday that while many legal matters can be handled internally, the matter of using outside firms is more complex.
"Certainly a lot of companies have lowered the number of outside firms they work with, and assigned to a smaller number of firms and asked for bigger discounts but just the number of firms isn't determinative," Wilber said. "Are they right for the work in question and are they working as a partner? It's a much more complicated set of topics than the survey draws pretty bold conclusions about."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/11/67/f75a9f5d46b08088f1ca60a48425/karp-clement-barr-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read!['A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options 'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/02/c8/47d457c84e2ba6f1200184b3b2e2/murphy-767x633-1.jpg)
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute read![Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/1c/0d/58f7b2954e4eb662e95202e9125d/haynes-and-boone-sign-767x633-2.jpg)
Haynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Family Law Practitioners Weigh In on Court System's New Joint Divorce Program
- 2State Bar Ethics Opinion Determines Texas Lawyers Can't Join a Firm With Non-Lawyer Partners
- 3'Don't Be Afraid:' AGs Push Against Trump's Immigration Policy
- 4State AG Hammers Homebuilder That Put $2,000-Per-day Non-Disparagement Penalty in Buyer Contracts
- 5Selendy Gay Files Lawsuit Challenging Trump's Workforce Reclassification EO
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250