US Judge Refuses to Reveal What Brought Chinese Professor's Fraud Case to NY
Bo Mao, 36, is accused of helping steal proprietary technology from a California startup to help Huawei, according to documents filed in Texas and New York federal courts.
September 11, 2019 at 05:25 PM
2 minute read
A Chinese professor charged in connection with an intellectual property dispute involving the Chinese telecom company Huawei was brought from the Dallas area to Brooklyn for reasons that cannot be publicly disclosed, prosecutors revealed in court Wednesday afternoon.
Bo Mao, 36, is accused of helping steal proprietary technology from a California startup to help Huawei, according to documents filed in Texas and New York federal courts. He has pleaded not guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
The motion to move the case to the Eastern District of New York contained grand jury information that cannot be released to the public or to Mao's defense attorneys, despite their requests to see it, Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander Solomon said in court.
One of Mao's defense attorneys, Thompson & Knight partner Richard Roper of Fort Worth, Texas, said he doesn't understand why the case has any connection to the Eastern District of New York at all.
"If there's some outrageous … information relating to my client, I'd certainly like to see it," Roper said.
U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly of the Eastern District of New York told Roper she didn't have much more to share about the venue.
Donnelly is also the judge in at least one more matter concerning Huawei, which wasn't discussed in court Wednesday.
In that case, prosecutors charged Huawei, one Huawei subsidiary and the company's chief financial officer with bank fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud in January. Huawei and another subsidiary were also charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice related to a grand jury investigation in the Eastern District of New York.
The government has redacted and sealed various documents in that case. In court Wednesday, Solomon said the Mao case will also involve classified materials, although he said he didn't expect Mao's defense lawyers to need security clearances.
Mao is scheduled to appear again in Donnelly's courtroom in November.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSamsung Faces a Crop of Class Suits Over Data Breach, but Prospects for Big Payout Are Uncertain
5 minute readEx-Prosecutors Weigh Strengths, Possible Defenses in Trump Fraud Civil Suit
Peloton's NYC HQ Doesn't Make It Subject to Consumers' False Ad Claims Under State's Business Law, Judge Rules
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250