NY AG Warns Companies Selling At-Home Sexual Assault Evidence Collection Kits to End Marketing and Sale
"I am deeply concerned about companies selling kits that deter individuals from seeking professional care and purport to collect evidence without knowing whether the evidence will be admissible in court," NY AG Letitia James said.
September 12, 2019 at 02:15 PM
5 minute read
Companies marketing do-it-yourself sexual assault evidence collection kits for sale on the internet were asked to stop advertising and selling their products Thursday by the New York Attorney General's Office, which said they may not be admissible in court.
Attorneys for the state, in separate 'cease and desist' letters to two companies selling those products, wrote that victims would be misled about how effective the kits would actually be.
The products are currently marketed by the MeToo Kits Co. and Preserve Group, the latter of which had its kit for sale on Amazon for approximately $30 Thursday. Neither company immediately returned a request for comment on the state's letters.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said there were several problems with the companies selling the kits as an evidence-collection tool, including their use in a legal proceeding.
"I am deeply concerned about companies selling kits that deter individuals from seeking professional care and purport to collect evidence without knowing whether the evidence will be admissible in court," James said. "We must ensure that all survivors of sexual assault are not misled and that justice is served."
Attorneys from her office noted in the letters to both companies that neither readily make clear on their websites that New York already provides evidence collection kits and exams to victims of sexual assault at no charge.
Victims of sexual assault in New York can have evidence collected for free at a number of locations, including hospitals and Sexual Assault Forensic Exam Centers, the AG's Office said. They'll also have access to treatment for any injuries, testing for sexually transmitted infections, and medication to prevent pregnancy.
"Your advertising for MeToo's at-home evidence kit fails to disclose that testing, evidence preservation and other services are available for free in New York," the letter sent to MeToo Kits Company said.
That company's website openly admits that "there is no guarantee that any of the evidence … will be admissible in court." At the same time, its advertising claims victims can use the product to collect "evidence required in a court of law."
Those two statements conflict with each other and mislead victims into thinking the kit will hold up in a legal proceeding, attorneys for the state wrote.
"These representations give the misleading impression that the evidence collected will be admissible in a court of law," the letter to MeToo Kits Co. said.
State and federal regulations, they wrote, also note that only members of law enforcement should be allowed to handle or transport evidence after it's been collected, not the victim or other third parties. That allows for the chain of custody to be maintained and used in court.
According to the state attorney general, the MeToo Kits Co., for example, has said victims should take a completed kit to either the police or a Title IX office after they've used it. But that's contrary to what's recommended by the government, and also wrongly suggests that victims are obligated to report the crime, the AG's Office wrote.
"In New York, it is the survivor's decision whether or not to file a police report," the letter to MeToo Kits said. "Your representation may deter survivors from evidence collection."
The products, themselves also don't meet a protocol set by the U.S. Department of Justice for sexual assault examination kits, the AG's Office wrote. The federal government requires certain material to be collected and advises the area to be kept in certain conditions while that's happening.
"It does not appear that the Preserve kit meets these guidelines, making its representations concerning its suitability for collecting evidence particularly, questionable," the AG's Office wrote in the letter to Preserve.
The kit from Preserve is marketed on Amazon as containing two swabs, a paper bag labeled for evidence, a hinge lifter and a piece of red tape. Those tools are misleading as the necessary instruments for evidence collection after a sexual assault, the state wrote, and may ultimately fail in court.
"Stamping a paper bag with 'Evidence' or taping it shut with a red piece of tape has nothing to do with whether any physical evidence gathered might ultimately be admissible in court," the letter to Preserve said.
The MeToo Kit Co.'s product also markets itself as a "deterrent for sexual assault," which the AG's Office took issue with in the letter. The wrote that the representation would give a misleading impression to victims that they're somehow safer after purchasing the product.
"This reckless and unsupported representation could lead to serious consequences, as individuals may be lulled into a false sense of security and be less careful with their personal safety as a result," the letter said.
The companies were advised to immediately stop advertising and selling their products, or possibly face further action from the state, the letters said.
READ MORE:
New York Leading Antitrust Investigation Into Facebook, AG James Says
Dollar Store Chains Settle With NY AG James Over Sale of Outdated Products
New York State Leads New Challenge to 'Public Charge' Rule From Trump Administration
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250