Industry Group Vows Legal Challenge to Cuomo's Executive Ban on Flavored E-Cigarettes
A trade association for e-cigarette makers said it is waiting to see what, exactly, is included in the final regulation before they decide how to best move forward.
September 16, 2019 at 03:12 PM
5 minute read
A ban on the sale of flavored electronic cigarettes that has been imposed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo will be challenged in court, representatives from the industry said Monday, one day before a state panel is expected to promulgate the new rule.
The New York State Vapors Association has been speaking with attorneys about how they'll approach the litigation, but plans to take legal action either way, its president said.
"Of course we're going to have to take legal action," said Cheryl Richter, president of the group. "We've been talking to lawyers and the strategy isn't worked out yet, but we don't even know what the [emergency regulation] is going to say."
Richter did not say which attorneys they're considering for the challenge, but said the process of choosing a legal team is already underway.
They'll have to act fast if they want to immediately seek judicial review of Cuomo's ban. It's set to be approved Tuesday, with a leeway period of about two weeks, Cuomo said Monday. After that, store owners could be subject to civil enforcement actions from the state.
The process isn't like other executive actions taken by Cuomo. It has to go through the Public Health and Health Planning Council, a state entity that can promulgate regulations related to public health.
The panel, which Cuomo said is on board with an emergency action to ban the sale of flavored electronic cigarettes, also known as vapes or vaporizers, in New York is scheduled to meet Tuesday. If its members approve the ban, the council will issue an emergency regulation barring stores from selling those products.
Richter said they're waiting to see what, exactly, is included in the final regulation before they decide how to best move forward, from a legal perspective. As of now, they've heard conflicting ideas about what's expected from the panel.
"It's still a little too early for [the attorneys] to decide what the legal strategy is going to be. Frankly, I think they have so many options," Richter said. "How many ways can you look at this as unconstitutional?"
The ban was announced by Cuomo on Sunday after the state Department of Health documented more than five dozen lung illnesses that they've said were tied to the use of electronic cigarettes, or vaping.
Those individuals, state and federal officials have said, fell ill after using products that unlawfully contained THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, and vitamin E acetate, a thickening agent used to cut the effect of that drug.
Cuomo's taken other executive actions in recent weeks in response to the illnesses, as well, including a requirement that stores post warning signs about the potential health effects of electronic cigarettes where they're sold.
Another executive order issued by Cuomo last week requires state agencies in New York to ramp up public education campaigns about vaping, including in school districts. The issue, Cuomo said during a radio interview Monday, is that children are getting their hands on vapes and developing an addiction to nicotine.
"They are introducing nicotine to kids who are young. They know that it's addictive, they're doing what the tobacco companies did with cigarettes," Cuomo said. "They're advertising to them."
Cuomo said during a second radio interview Monday that state and federal officials don't know what the ultimate health consequences of vaping, in general, will be for frequent users. That's part of why selling them in flavors attractive to young people is such a problem, he said.
When asked if his executive ban on flavored electronic cigarettes would hold up in court, Cuomo appeared confident in his administration's legal authority to promulgate the regulation.
"It's abundantly clear on the evidence, we have young people dying," Cuomo said. "The law provides the Public Health Council with the ability to take emergency reasons for precisely this reason."
Richter argued Monday that Cuomo's ban would do nothing to address the illnesses documented by the state because those were thought to be caused by products purchased illegally. Instead, she said, stores selling legal products would bear the brunt of the harm.
"These small shops are basically being vilified and penalized for the actions of drug dealers," Richter said.
That's not to say that her group doesn't support stronger regulations around electronic cigarettes, particularly when it comes to illegal sales to children. They've advocated for stores to have technology that would verify the age of customers, either online or through their ID, she said.
They've also pushed for tighter marketing restrictions on those products, like barring any materials or flavors that would appeal to children. Cuomo wants the same, but said he wouldn't be able to do that without action from the Legislature next year.
"The stopping of the advertising from these companies, that requires legislation," Cuomo said. "I do need the Legislature to act and that would be next year."
Next year's legislative session is scheduled to being in January.
READ MORE:
Consumers in NY Overpaid $2B in Insurance Premiums Because of Opioid Crisis, State Says
Judge Strikes Down Outside Income Ban for NY Lawmakers, Upholds Salary Hike
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250