Realty Law Digest
Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein, discusses a contracts case "Vahdat v. Capdel," a landlord-tenant case "Mayflower Props. v. Pacheco," and a construction law case " Maple Drake Austell Owner v. D.F. Pray Inc."
September 17, 2019 at 02:25 PM
18 minute read
Contracts—Right of First Refusal Cannot be Exercised After a Prior Exercise and Default—Sanctions Granted
A plaintiff claimed that a defendant breached an agreement to give the plaintiff a right of first refusal (ROFR) to purchase real property. The defendant moved to dismiss, to vacate a notice of pendency and for sanctions. The court granted the motion to dismiss, since the ROFR no longer exists—"a party related to plaintiff exercised it but then defaulted." The court categorized the action as "frivolous" and awarded "costs in the form of reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred and reasonable attorney's fees."
The defendant owned the subject real property. The plaintiff owned a neighboring property. Pursuant to a July 2006 written agreement (agreement), the defendant's predecessor and the plaintiff had agreed that the plaintiff and any successors or assigns formed by the plaintiff's managing member would have a ROFR to buy the defendant's property.
In 2017, the plaintiff exercised the ROFR and an entity, whose managing member was plaintiff, entered into a contract with the defendant for sale of the property. A closing date had been extended to November 1, 2017, time being of the essence. On October 27, 2017, the purchaser commenced an action and moved to stay the closing. The court had denied that motion. The purchaser failed to appear at the closing. A court previously held that the purchaser had defaulted and that the defendant was entitled to keep the down-payment as liquidated damages.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250