Brooklyn US Judge Rules NY Law Examiners Must Obey Federal Law for Persons With Disabilities
A federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has ruled that the state's board of law examiners is subject to a federal law banning discrimination on the basis of disability from any program or activity receiving federal funding.
September 18, 2019 at 05:47 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has ruled that the state's board of law examiners, which administrates the New York bar exam, is subject to a federal law banning discrimination on the basis of disability from any program or activity receiving federal funding.
The order Wednesday from U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie of the Eastern District of New York denied a motion to dismiss from the board and clarified the board's obligations toward people seeking accommodations for disabilities as they take the bar exam.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 applies to the board, Dearie ruled, because it is a "program or activity" of the state's Unified Courts System, which receives federal funding.
Dearie found that the complaint made out a case that the board discriminated against the plaintiff, who is identified by her initials T.W. in court documents, by denying her full accommodations the first two times she took the bar exam, in 2013 and 2014. She failed both times and lost her job at a respected law firm as a result, her attorney Jo Anne Simon said.
The third time T.W. sat for the bar exam, she didn't provide any more evidence about her needs, but she was finally granted the right accommodations and passed, Simon said.
"(But) once you're out of the loop, you're derailed from the big law firms," Simon said.
In 1998, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the board was subject to Section 504 because it accepted state vouchers for certain bar exam and registration fees, and the vouchers came from agencies receiving federal funds. But in 2011—partly in response to the 1998 decision, Dearie wrote—the board stopped accepting vouchers, and the agencies began reimbursing bar candidates for their fees instead.
Simon argued that the reimbursement meant the board still received federal funds. Dearie disagreed, but he also found that that didn't matter for Section 504.
No matter what vouchers the board takes or doesn't take, Dearie ruled, its financial and administrative relationship with the Unified Courts System means that it is a program or entity of the system under Section 504.
The Board of Law Examiners' executive director, John McAlary, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read More:
2nd Circuit Confirms Abstention From Case Challenging Protections Afforded Disabled New Yorkers
NY Lawmakers Plan to Address Surge in ADA Website Accessibility Suits
Navigating the Murky Waters of ADA Compliance in the Internet Age
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250