Bronx Judge Orders Trump to Be Deposed in Case Alleging Assault of Protesters
In her order, Judge Doris Gonzalez wrote that constitutional arguments about the president's vulnerability to prosecution are not relevant in this case.
September 20, 2019 at 02:59 PM
3 minute read
A Bronx Supreme Court administrative judge on Friday ordered President Donald Trump to appear for a video deposition in a case involving an alleged 2015 assault of protesters outside Trump Tower by employees of the Trump Organization.
In her order, Bronx Supreme Court Administrative Judge Doris Gonzalez wrote that constitutional arguments about the president's vulnerability to prosecution are not relevant in this case.
"The only issue presented in these motions is whether the President's testimony is necessary at trial," Gonzalez wrote.
Questions about Trump's control over his employees are relevant to the case, Gonzalez wrote.
"President Trump's relationship with the other defendants is now central to plaintiffs' prosecution of their claims under the theory of respondeat superior," Gonzalez wrote. "As such, his testimony is indispensable."
Jury selection in the case is currently set to begin Thursday. It's not clear when Trump will be deposed or if the trial date will be pushed back.
Ben Dictor of Eisner Dictor, who is representing the plaintiffs, including Efrain Galicia, said Gonzalez' decision affirms the principle that no one is above the law.
"This is a case about Mr. Trump's responsibility as an employer of individuals who were authorized to use force in the course of their duties as employees to him and to the Trump Organization and to the Trump campaign," Dictor said.
Dictor said he'll present evidence at trial showing that Trump authorized and condoned his employees' conduct that day, when employees, including then-Trump bodyguard Keith Schiller, allegedly got into a physical altercation with protesters.
Lawrence Rosen of LaRocca Hornik Rosen Greenberg, who is representing Trump in this case, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In her reasoning, Gonzalez cited a 2018 decision that allowed Summer Zervos' defamation lawsuit against Trump to go forward.
Trump appealed a trial court's ruling in the Zervos case, arguing that the U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Clinton v. Jones, which said a president may be sued in federal court, did not say a president could be haled into state court on a civil matter.
But the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division for the First Department rejected Trump's argument, green-lighting that lawsuit.
Dictor said he looked forward to deposing Trump as he would a witness in any other case.
"The date of trial is not automatically postponed. … Mr. Trump is under an order from the court to be deposed, on videotape, before the commencement of the trial," Dictor said.
No motion asking the court to push back the trial date had been filed by press time, according to the New York State courts' online docket.
READ MORE:
Trump Calls Investigation From Manhattan DA Vance Unconstitutional in Newly Unsealed Complaint
SDNY Judge Clears Way for Class Action Alleging Trump Corporation Pushed Bad Investments
NY Agency Issues Subpoena to Trump Organization's Insurance Broker
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250