Trump Lawyers Ask for More Time for Accounting Firm's Compliance With Vance's Subpoena
The president's legal team said a stay agreed to by Vance—which expires Wednesday—won't give the federal court enough time to adequately consider whether the subpoenas may be enforced.
September 24, 2019 at 06:22 PM
3 minute read
President Donald Trump's lawyers on Tuesday asked for more time before his personal accounting firm must comply with a Manhattan Supreme Court grand jury subpoena seeking his tax returns.
In what's expected to be the final substantive filing before a showdown between Trump lawyers and New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday morning, the president's legal team said a stay agreed to by Vance—which expires Wednesday—won't give the federal court enough time to adequately consider whether the subpoenas may be enforced.
The subpoenas were issued Aug. 29 and first reported by the New York Times on Sept. 16.
Trump lawyers turned last week to the Southern District of New York federal court to sue Vance and the accounting firm, Mazars USA, in federal court, contesting the subpoena and describing it as a politically motivated attack.
Vance agreed to stay enforcement of the subpoena until Wednesday afternoon, shortly after the hearing, but Trump's lawyers argued that won't give the district court enough time to consider the case.
Instead, Trump's lawyers, in a brief submitted by William Consovoy of Consovoy McCarthy, asked U.S. Senior District Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York to extend Mazars' deadline to comply until seven days after he has ruled on Trump's motion for a preliminary injunction.
The general counsel for Vance's office, Carey Dunne, argued Monday that Trump should have filed suit in state court, since he was contesting a state subpoena.
Trump's lawyers replied that, while the 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision Younger v. Harris found that federal courts should usually avoid interference with state criminal prosecutions, "that ship has already sailed when a state is pursuing criminal process against a sitting president."
Trump faces permanent harm if his tax returns are released, his lawyers argued, because they are his confidential financial information and because he has the right to judicial review of the constitutional claims raised in this case. They rejected assurances from Vance about the confidentiality of grand jury materials, noting that New York could change its laws at any time.
The hearing in the case is set for 9:30 a.m. Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250