Flagging Insurance Law Firm D'Amato & Lynch Accused of $1M Fraud
An insurance company's lawsuit against the firm says a settlement check was taken at a time when D'Amato & Lynch was experiencing "financial difficulties."
September 30, 2019 at 04:36 PM
3 minute read
An insurance company has accused law firm D'Amato & Lynch of depositing a client's $1 million settlement check into its operating account and refusing to pay it back, the latest sign of trouble at the Manhattan law firm known for its work in the insurance industry.
D'Amato & Lynch, which was sued by its former landlord earlier this year amid a marked decline in its head count, now faces a lawsuit by an insurance company. The latter suit, filed Sept. 20 in Manhattan Supreme Court, alleges the law firm placed a $1 million check made out to its trust account into its operating account, instead of using it to fund a client's settlement. The act took place amid "financial difficulties" for the law firm, the suit alleges.
The firm's website is now offline and several phone numbers immediately went to voicemail. It lists dozens of employees on LinkedIn, however. Luke Lynch Jr., the firm's managing partner, said in an email to the New York Law Journal that he has been caring for his wife since February and said he "had no involvement in this matter." He didn't respond to questions about the status of the firm.
"I have no comment other than the allegations as to me are incorrect," he wrote about the Sept. 20 lawsuit. "The matter has been referred to our insurer and is under investigation."
The developments come after years of dwindling numbers at the law firm, which was founded in 1969 by George D'Amato and eventually grew to nearly 100 lawyers, and dozens more staff, in a nine-story office in New York and a location in London, according to an archived copy of its website.
The firm left its offices at 70 Pine St., then being sold by its client AIG, in 2010 and decamped to 225 Liberty St. Its most recent offices were at 59 Maiden Lane downtown, on the 40th floor.
The Sept. 20 lawsuit was filed by First Mercury Insurance Co., acting through its agent, Riverstone Claims Management.
According to the complaint, First Mercury, whose claims manager said it hired D'Amato & Lynch to defend First Mercury policyholders in personal injury lawsuits, cut a $1 million check Oct. 15, 2018, to "D'Amato & Lynch LLP Trust Account" to cover a settlement in a case where the firm represented the insured.
Sometime afterward, the suit continued, "D&L advised that it was no longer able to handle the [First Mercury] files" and began transferring them to other lawyers. It subsequently notified First Mercury that it deposited the check in the wrong account, but since then, "has refused, failed to and without cause not returned the $1 million trust money."
The suit includes causes of action for negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conversion, unjust enrichment, and violations of Section 487 of the New York Judiciary Law and of Rule 1.15 of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct. Andrew Bluestone, a lawyer for First Mercury and its claims manager, declined to comment.
Several former attorneys and staff at or formerly at the firm—Arturo Boutin, Michael Haig, David Boyar and Robert Lang—were named in the suit as defendants, in addition to Lynch. Boyar declined to comment and other individual defendants couldn't be reached.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250