Geoffrey Berman, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Photo: John Taggart/BloombergGeoffrey Berman Letter Says US Attorney's Office Will File Papers in Trump Subpoena Challenge
President Donald Trump sued New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., calling the subpoena, which was issued to Mazars, an accounting firm that has performed work for Trump and his businesses, a "campaign to harass the president."
October 01, 2019 at 11:46 AM
3 minute read
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is planning to weigh in on constitutional issues raised by federal lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump Sept. 19 challenging a Manhattan grand jury subpoena seeking his tax returns, according to a notice sent Monday by prosecutors to the judge presiding over the case.
Trump sued New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. in the Southern District of New York, calling the subpoena, which was issued to Mazars, an accounting firm that has performed work for Trump and his businesses, a "campaign to harass the president" and making the constitutional argument that he should be immune to state prosecution as long as he is in the White House.
Vance's lawyers have pointed out that a grand jury subpoena does not mean the president will necessarily be charged with any crimes and that grand juries typically have wide-ranging investigative powers. They also argued that the case should have been filed in state court since it was taking issue with a state subpoena.
The first hint of federal prosecutors' involvement came late Sept. 24, hours before attorneys representing Trump and Vance were scheduled for a hearing in the courtroom of U.S. Senior District Judge Victor Marrero.
Southern District U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman filed a letter that night supporting a temporary restraining order, saying it would give his office time to decide whether to participate.
He asked the court to prohibit enforcement of the subpoena "to preserve the status quo while the Court has the opportunity to receive a more complete presentation regarding the weighty constitutional issues raised by plaintiff's suit."
Marrero set a deadline Monday for the U.S. Attorney's Office to say whether it would participate and a filing deadline Wednesday.
Berman sent a one-paragraph notice to Marrero Monday, confirming that prosecutors will file papers by 5 p.m. Wednesday.
Meanwhile, lawyers for Trump and Vance have agreed that Vance's office will not enforce the subpoena until 1 p.m. Oct. 7 or 1 p.m. on the day that falls two business days after Marrero rules on pending motions, whichever is sooner.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Decision of the Day: Judge Precludes Ballistics Expert's Opinion on Scene for 2016 Fatal Police Shooting
Decision of the Day: Contingency Fee to Counsel Result of Successful Advocacy, Not Windfall
AI Startup Founder Defrauded Investors of Millions, US Prosecutors Say
3 minute read
Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
