Rudy Giuliani Is Not A Defense Lawyer
I have been a defense lawyer in our nation's state and federal courts for more than forty years. I am very proud of that and most of my colleagues…
October 02, 2019 at 11:23 AM
3 minute read
I have been a defense lawyer in our nation's state and federal courts for more than forty years. I am very proud of that and most of my colleagues who call themselves defense lawyers feel the same way. As a group we tend to be very independent, representing underdogs, minorities, outcasts and those rightly or wrongly accused.
We have our moments of financial success but since we often represent individuals and not by Fortune 500 companies, we typically struggle to make ends meet. We strive for a way of thinking that is akin to the lifestyle of our greatest predecessor, Clarence Darrow.
We defend against all odds or as one of us was heard to say: "Our defense is to be against all laws and all humanity." This was said by a famous French attorney who was saddled with the impossible task of representing a Nazi war criminal. It is an extreme statement but it does explain the often desperate plight of defense lawyers.
It is a noble and honorable calling for those who live up to their oaths; to wit: "To preserve, protect and defend, the Constitution of the United States of America." So our mission is also patriotic. We have been described as the champions of liberty and freedom for all.
Defending against criminal charges or avoiding prosecution is what we do. We hire investigators to research the complainants and to find the weak spots in the prosecution's case. While some of us are involved in politics that is not our primary niche. We are not generally engaged to dig up dirt on political opponents. Mr. Giuliani's efforts in Ukraine are not part of any defense lawyer's job description.
Why is Mr. Giuliani engaged at all? Is it to tout the title of counsel to the president of the United States? Mr. Trump has not been charged with anything and while an impeachment inquiry has been started, Mr. Giuliani has made himself into a witness against his own client due to his own actions in Ukraine on behalf of Mr. Trump. Mr. Giuliani's actions support the claims that Mr. Trump supported the involvement of Russians in our 2016 elections and is once again encouraging foreign interference in 2020.
As a witness to substantial and material facts in the impeachment inquiry, Mr. Giuliani must be disqualified from representing Mr. Trump. While the president cannot be prosecuted while in office, Mr. Giuliani certainly can be.
Thomas Liotti is a past president of the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and former chair of the New York State Bar Association's Criminal Justice Section.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 2Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 3Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 4Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 5Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250