Ex-White & Case Staffer Sues Firm After Confrontation Over Salary
A former practice assistant at the firm is alleging double-barreled violations of New York State labor law.
October 07, 2019 at 04:26 PM
3 minute read
A former White & Case practice assistant sued the firm in Manhattan Supreme Court on Friday, alleging she was fired for revealing the firm's effort to discipline her for discussing her salary with coworkers, in a double breach of New York state law.
Kristen Blanda is seeking damages and attorney fees from the international law firm, where she worked for less than five months, from Feb. 10 to June 21. Her complaint alleges violation of state law prohibiting employers from silencing salary discussions, as well as retaliation.
Two days prior to her firing, the suit says, Blanda met with two of the firm's human resources personnel, who reprimanded her for sharing her salary information with her coworkers.
In her lawsuit, Blanda said New York law allowed her to talk about her salary with her coworkers in the absence of a written policy in place prohibiting those discussions. However, Charles Busuttil, the firm's human resources manager, allegedly told Blanda on June 19 that she was not permitted to discuss her salary and delivered a reprimand.
Later that day, according to the complaint, Busuttil told Blanda she was not allowed to talk about her reprimand. But by then, Blanda alleges, she had already complained about her situation to a coworker, "specifically voicing her frustration that she should not have been reprimanded for sharing information about her salary with her coworkers, as plaintiff knew that she was permitted to do so under New York law."
White & Case "never, at any time, presented plaintiff with any written policy defining or limiting the circumstances under which defendant's employees are permitted to discuss their wages / salaries with one another," Blanda wrote in her eight-page complaint.
Section 194(4) of the New York Labor Law says "no employer shall prohibit an employee from inquiring about, discussing, or disclosing the wages of such employee or another employee." That same provision does allow an employer to set limits on when and how employees can talk about their salaries through a written policy.
White & Case declined to comment on the case through a spokesperson.
According to the complaint, Busuttil found out Blanda complained about her reprimand and "abruptly emailed and texted her" while Blanda was on an approved vacation. When she called him in response, Busuttil allegedly said she was going to be fired for talking about their conversation.
As a practice assistant, Blanda said she helped the firm's lawyers prepare documents, book travel and "[provide] support for legal work on an as-needed basis."
Blanda is represented by Michael Minkoff, Alexander Coleman and Michael Borrelli of Borrelli & Associates. They did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250