Michael Avenatti Gets April Trial Date Over Charges He Stole From Stormy Daniels
"Welcome to Russia," said Michael Avenatti after the hearing.
October 08, 2019 at 04:47 PM
4 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge on Tuesday set a "hard and fast" April 21 trial date in a criminal case accusing Michael Avenatti of stealing $300,000 from his former client, the adult film star known as Stormy Daniels.
U.S. District Judge Deborah A. Batts of the Southern District of New York said the April trial date would give Avenatti and his attorney, Dean Steward, time to file a range of expected motions, including one to dismiss the indictment for vindictive prosecution. The trial, she said, would last about two weeks.
Avenatti, who is facing three federal indictments in two jurisdictions, has claimed that he is the target of a U.S. Justice Department that is out to get him because of his outspoken criticism of President Donald Trump.
Avenatti has already filed a similar motion in a separate case in Manhattan, which accuses the embattled attorney of trying to extort athletic apparel company Nike Inc. for millions of dollars. However, the suggestion Tuesday seemed to chafe Batts, who responded: "This office is not known for being vindictive."
Steward said that his client had made "very, very powerful enemies" within the federal government, including Attorney General William Barr, whom he described as "frankly, the lapdog for Donald Trump."
Asked for comment after the hearing, Avenatti said that while he was under indictment, "the biggest criminal in America occupies the White House, abuses his power, uses the Department of Justice to target his enemies."
"Welcome to Russia," he said.
Avenatti stands accused of diverting two payments of $150,000 from an advance on a book deal being paid to Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford. At the time, Avenatti was representing Clifford, who said she had engaged in an extramarital affair with Trump—a claim the president has repeatedly denied.
Prosecutors said in a May 22 indictment that Avenatti had forged Clifford's name on a letter to her literary agent and instructed two payments of nearly $150,000 to be sent to a bank account under his own control. According to the indictment, Clifford did not know about the bank account, and half of the diverted sum has yet to be repaid.
Steward said that another pretrial issue would involve voice messages and supposedly hundreds of text messages between Avenatti and Clifford that would be relevant to the case. Steward said prosecutors had turned over 64 pages of texts, but a discovery motion might also be necessary if there are more materials that he needed to obtain.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Sobelman said the government had produced everything Clifford had given them. As for the vindictive prosecution motion, he said, "it's frivolous."
"We are fairly confident that motion has no merit," he told Batts.
Avenatti's pretrial motions are due by Nov. 12, with the government slated to respond the following month. Any reply briefs would need to be filed Dec. 20.
Avenatti also faces charges in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, where he is accused in a sprawling indictment of embezzling millions of dollars from other clients. Batts last month denied Avenatti's request to transfer the Clifford case to that jurisdiction, saying the request would be "unduly burdensome to the government and would be against the interests of justice."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250