Judges Head Back to School to Prepare for Presumptive Mediation Initiative
When officials from the state Office of Court Administration asked if professor Alexandra Carter would be open to having the judges sit in this year, she jumped at the idea.
October 09, 2019 at 02:47 PM
5 minute read
Judges in New York are hitting the books and heading back to school to prepare for an incoming initiative that will require most civil litigants to try resolving their cases through mediation.
A handful of jurists, mostly from the New York City Civil Court, sat alongside students at Columbia Law School last month to brush up their knowledge on mediation, and how it's used.
That training was held over two weeks at the Columbia Law School Mediation Clinic, which was the first institution to deliver training to judges this year in preparation for the state's initiative on presumptive ADR, or alternative dispute resolution.
Professor Alexandra Carter, the former director of clinical education at Columbia Law School, leads the training every semester. When officials from the state Office of Court Administration asked if she would be open to having the judges sit in this year, she jumped at the idea.
"I was really impressed because here you have some really senior judicial leaders, who have been on the bench since I matriculated from Columbia Law as a student, coming back to model learning and really immerse themselves in mediation," Carter said.
Five judges signed up for the training, along with Lisa Denig, who's special counsel for ADR Initiatives at OCA.
Among those jurists were Judge Anthony Cannataro, the administrative judge of the New York City Civil Court.
"The reason why I went is because I'm the person responsible for rolling out the ADR plan in the New York City Civil Court, and mediation is certainly a big part of ADR," Cannatarro said. "I wanted to increase my knowledge of that."
He was joined at the training by Justices Debra Samuels and Carol Sharpe, both from the New York City Civil Court, Bronx Housing Court Justice David Bryan and Westchester Surrogate's Court Justice Brandon Sall.
Carter said it's common for her students to be paired with professionals outside Columbia Law School when she holds the training each semester. People regularly attend from the Civilian Complaint Review Board, for example, and they've had attendees from the United Nations.
"I think it really makes it a rich experience for both the students and the outside professionals to be partnered together and see different ways of looking at problems," Carter said.
But this was the first time so many senior and judicial administrative leaders attended the training, she said. Despite their attendance, Carter said she chose not to alter the format of the training.
"It was a wonderful experience because the judges brought so much knowledge to bear," Carter said. "So, the discussion was elevated but we teach the same skills, the same process, and the same values no matter who is in the room."
Cannatarro said judges who've spent years on the bench without training in mediation might have a different view of what the practice actually is. That's another part of what fueled his interest in attending the training. Cannatarro said he'd previously been told by mediation experts that what he does, in court, is an entirely different procedure than what's practiced in alternative dispute resolution.
"I wanted to understand the difference between the traditional form of mediation, how it's envisioned by the experts in that field versus what I do day-to-day on the bench," Cannatarro said. "It was, actually, tremendously different from what I do."
The training course isn't just informational; it also provides students and others with the first part of their credentials to mediate in New York state. The training is held over two weeks for a total of about 35 hours for participants.
Carter said anyone taking the course, including the judges, learn just about everything about the practice, including the stages of mediation, the component skills, the goals of the process, and the ethical obligations of mediators.
"It's a soup to nuts training, so everything from before we sit down, the moment we're told we're mediating the case, all the way through how you write a mediation agreement, how that's enforced, and how we thank the parties," Carter said.
A lot of that includes practice. For about half the course, attendees are practicing the skills they're learning from the course, Carter said. Judges were paired, at times, with students from Columbia Law School and had coaches available to guide them through the process.
"It's that type of hands-on approach that we find is really the best for training mediators, because some of the best learning takes place in that moment," Carter said.
It's not the first time judges within the state court system have been trained in mediation, but Cannatarro said he hopes other jurists will sign up for a similar course as the state begins its implementation of presumptive ADR.
"Hopefully we'll have a lot of judges who will have taken this training," Cannatarro said.
Carter said she would welcome any judge that wants to take the course at Columbia, which will offer the training again in January and each semester thereafter.
Implementation of the state's ADR program is underway now for portions of the local plans, according to a spokesman for OCA. The remaining portions of the plans are being finalized.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250