Western NY City Court Judge, Who Presided Over Cases Involving Credit Union Tied to His Brother, Is Censured
Lockport City Court Judge Thomas DiMillo, an attorney who earns $200,400 in the position, agreed to the censure and said he didn't know his actions constituted misconduct.
October 11, 2019 at 12:41 PM
5 minute read
A city court judge in Niagara County was censured by a New York state panel Friday for presiding over more than 2,500 civil matters involving a credit union that his brother, also an attorney, served as both an officer and a member of its executive committee.
Lockport City Court Judge Thomas DiMillo, an attorney who earns $200,400 in the position, agreed to the censure and said he didn't know his actions constituted misconduct.
According to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, the panel tasked with reviewing allegations against the state's judges, DiMillo was the judge of record for 2,548 cases in which the credit union connected to his brother was the plaintiff.
Those cases were brought before DiMillo over the course of a decade, from November 2005 to December 2016. During that time, his brother, Angelo DiMillo, was both a board member and officer of the institution, the Cornerstone Community Federal Credit Union.
Judge DiMillo, when he took the bench in 2005, told court staff that cases involving his brother's law firm, Muscato DiMillo & Vona in Lockport, New York, should be assigned to another judge. He did not do so for cases involving the credit union, according to the commission.
Over the course of his first decade on the bench, DiMillo did not recuse himself from cases involving the CCFCU or disclose that his brother was affiliated with the credit union, the commission said. His brother was not paid for his positions with the CCFCU.
DiMillo, for his part, told the commission he didn't know there was a rule that disqualified him from presiding over those cases, or any others involving the credit union.
"Respondent avers that, until the Commission's inquiry in this matter, he was unaware of the rule disqualifying a judge from cases where a person he knows to be within the sixth degree of relationship to him is an officer of a party," the commission's decision said.
Each case from the CCFCU that came before him involved a defendant that either defaulted or otherwise didn't contest the claims against them, so no trials were held involving the credit union.
In another instance, in 2017, DiMillo presided over a small claims hearing in a case brought against the credit union from the owner of a snowplowing company, who was seeking $5,000 on a multimonth contract that the CCFCU had terminated.
DiMillo decided, after a hearing, that the credit union had lawfully terminated the contract, but ordered that $200 be paid to the snowplowing company's owner for the work he performed immediately before the agreement ended.
Since the commission contacted him this year about the misconduct in that case, and the others before it, DiMillo has instructed court staff to refer matters involving the credit union to other judges since his brother is still an officer and board member of the CCFCU, the commission said.
Robert Tembeckjian, the commission's administrator, credited DiMillo for accepting responsibility and taking steps to prevent a similar situation in the future, but said his past behavior could have presented an appearance of bias.
"A judge should not preside in a case where a close relative is on the board of one of the institutional parties," Tembeckjian said. "Even if the relative's role is passive and the matter is uncontested, a judge's participation, and any rulings favoring the relative's interests, would inevitably appear to be biased."
Angelo DiMillo declined to comment extensively on the commission's decision, but said his brother "learned a lesson."
"There's really no comment. I think the commission did the appropriate thing," DiMillo said. "I think my brother's learned a lesson and there's really nothing else I can say about it."
DiMillo was represented before the commission by Joel Daniels, a defense attorney from Buffalo. Daniels said DiMillo cooperated fully with the commission and is respected by lawyers and litigants from the region.
"He acknowledged his failure to recuse himself in the credit union cases," Daniels said. "It was an inadvertent error on his part, and he looks forward to continuing to serve the Lockport community."
DiMillo's current term as a Lockport city court judge ends in 2027, according to the commission. He also serves as an acting Niagara County Family Court judge.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Aging Condo Neglect Leads to $1M Payout in Miami Beach Slip and Fall
- 2‘BiT Global Lost’: Federal Judge Won’t Stop Coinbase From Delisting wBTC Token
- 3Some Elite Universities Favor Wealthy Students in Admissions Decisions, Lawsuit Alleges
- 4Judge Asks: Should Tom Girardi Serve Sentence in a Medical Facility or Behind Bars?
- 5EPA grants California authority to ban sales of new gas cars by 2035. Action faces reversal by Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250