Grand Jury Subpoena Won't Start 'Parade of Horribles:' Manhattan Prosecutors Seeks Dismissal of Trump Challenge
Carey Dunne, general counsel in the DA's office, argued that Trump will not be harmed by the subpoena to his accounting firm, Mazars USA, despite his claims and urgent motions to the contrary.
October 15, 2019 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
In a brief filed late Tuesday, lawyers from the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. argued that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit should affirm the dismissal of a suit from President Donald Trump, who is seeking to avoid a grand jury subpoena from the DA's office for his tax returns.
Carey Dunne, general counsel in the DA's office, wrote that U.S. Senior District Judge Victor Marrero was correct in his Oct. 7 ruling that federal courts should stay out of a debate over a state subpoena. He went on to argue that Trump will not be harmed by the subpoena to his accounting firm, Mazars USA, despite his claims and urgent motions to the contrary.
"Lacking any cognizable legal basis to challenge the Mazars Subpoena, (Trump and the U.S. Department of Justice) resort to specious assertions that a parade of horribles will follow from enforcement," Dunne wrote.
Trump's attorney William Consovoy of Consovoy McCarthy filed two motions Tuesday morning, asking for stays in case he loses in the Second Circuit and needs to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Those motions both rested on the idea that Trump will be subject to "irreparable harm" if the subpoena is enforced. Dunne attacked that idea in his brief Tuesday afternoon, writing that grand jury proceedings are secret and, since Trump has filed state and federal tax forms, he has already disclosed his tax information to government authorities with secrecy obligations.
Time is of the essence for the DA's office, Dunne wrote in an echo of previous arguments, because statutes of limitations are at risk of running out in the associated investigation. The exact matter under investigation has not been publicly discussed, but Dunne argued that delay itself is Trump's goal.
"Of course, in this situation, litigation delays — when accompanied by continued stays of subpoena compliance — mean that Trump will prevail in his ultimate goal of preventing disclosure of the records at issue until after the statutes of limitation expire, even if he does not ultimately prevail on the merits of his extravagant legal claim," Dunne wrote.
Dunne wrote that Trump has not been indicted, arrested, prosecuted or imprisoned, and any claim that he's immune from those actions is not yet ripe. Releasing tax returns should not take up much time, Dunne wrote, noting that previous presidents did so for decades.
Trump's lawyers have said many state prosecutors are likely to investigate the president if courts find that Vance can do it. Dunne responded by pointing out that Trump lived and worked in New York for years, so New York has more reason than other states to initiate investigations.
Trump's reply brief is due at 5 p.m. Thursday, and arguments are set for Oct. 23 in the Second Circuit.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers for Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250