In-House Legal Department of the Year: Bayer AG
The legal team had an extraordinary year of accomplishments related to the company's $64 billion purchase of Monsanto.
October 15, 2019 at 10:30 AM
2 minute read
Bayer AG's legal team, nominated by Sullivan & Cromwell, had an extraordinary year of accomplishments related to the company's $64 billion purchase of Monsanto—the largest acquisition ever of an American company by a foreign buyer, the largest completed all-cash takeover in history and the largest M&A transaction by a German company.
As described in detail in the Sullivan & Cromwell nomination submission, the legal team had to tackle issues in the areas of antitrust, M&A, intellectual property, environmental law and tax.
On the antitrust front, the team had to surmount a series of hurdles posed by regulators around the world, as this deal would combine two of the world's largest suppliers of agricultural products. Bayer's in-house lawyers developed novel ways to ease government concerns.
In addition, Bayer's lawyers helped develop a completely original piece of technology that it used to deliver enormous amounts of economic data to the European Commission and which allowed Bayer and Monsanto to transmit information faster and more accurately than other commercial options available.
Resolving IP issues also required novel thinking. The U.S. Department of Justice raised concerns about Bayer's immense portfolio of patents, but Bayer was able to retain vital crop science IP that it might have lost.
On the financing front, the company's lawyers helped raise $19 billion in equity capital, including a record-breaking €4 billion mandatory convertible bond.
The extraordinary and creative efforts of Bayer's in-house lawyers enabled the company to move forward on this landmark deal, and for this the New York Law Journal honors Bayer with its In-House Legal Department of the Year award.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1Baker McKenzie Builds on AI Foundation, Crafting Tools to Help Lawyers Work 'Better, Smarter'
- 2Paul Weiss, Trailblazer for U.S. Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
- 3Formal Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
- 4Top 10 Predicted Business and Human Rights Issues for 2025
- 5$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250