Rising Star: Jonah Knobler
Partner, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler
October 15, 2019 at 11:17 AM
2 minute read
Practice Profile: Jonah Knobler is a partner in Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler's litigation department in New York City. His practice centers on class actions and complex litigation, false-advertising disputes, and food-and-drug law. Mr. Knobler has over a decade of experience representing global and national pharmaceutical, food, beverage, cosmetic, and dietary supplement manufacturers in high-stakes false advertising, consumer protection, civil RICO, and product liability suits.
Leadership, Pro Bono and Civic Work: Mr. Knobler's active pro bono practice currently focuses on LGBTQ+ rights and voting rights.
Mr. Knobler is currently counsel for amicus interACT: Advocates for Intersex Youth in Zzyym v. Pompeo, an appeal in the Tenth Circuit regarding the denial of passports to Americans who identify as intersex, as well as in the three LGBT Title VII cases now before the U.S. Supreme Court. He also filed amicus briefs in Obergefell v. Hodges (involving marriage equality) and Gloucester School Board v. G.G. (involving the rights of transgender students). Recently, he was one of the plaintiffs' counsel in Rucho v. Common Cause, a challenge to North Carolina's gerrymandered congressional map, which succeeded twice at the District Court level but was reversed 5-4 by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Prior Experience:
Law Clerk, Hon. Danny J. Boggs, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2009–2010
Law Clerk, Hon. Frederic Block, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 2008–2009
McCleary Law Fellowship, Human Rights Campaign, Summer 2004
Education:
J.D., Harvard Law School, 2006, cum laude
B.A., Harvard University, 2003, linguistics, cum laude
What advice would you give to young lawyers?
Read as much stellar legal writing as you can, whether it's immediately relevant to your practice or not. The more great legal writing you read, the more you'll internalize it, and the more clearly you'll think, write, and argue yourself.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 2'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 3The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 4Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 5In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250