Practice Profile: As a member of Jones Day's Issues & Appeals group, Rajeev Muttreja's practice focuses on appellate litigation, motion practice, other law-oriented pretrial work, and client counseling, all typically involving complex or unsettled legal issues. Mr. Muttreja has extensive experience defending False Claims Act cases, particularly within the health care industry, but is a generalist who also has significant experience with issues of federal jurisdiction, RICO, class actions, corporate governance, securities law, administrative law, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Among his notable representations, Mr. Muttreja has played a leading role in Celgene's defense of False Claims Act and RICO lawsuits alleging the promotion of off-label pharmaceutical uses, and he was a key member of the team that won the landmark personal-jurisdiction case Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations v. Brown, 131 S. Ct. 2846 (2011).
Leadership, Pro Bono and Civic Work: Mr. Muttreja maintains an active pro bono practice, including as an appointed member of the Second Circuit's pro bono panel. He recently argued and won Williams v. Annucci, 895 F.3d 180 (2d Cir. 2018), which concerned a New York prisoner's right to receive a kosher diet compliant with his religious beliefs. He was praised by name for his "well-stated arguments" in Bruce v. Warden Lewisburg USP, 868 F.3d 170 (3d Cir. 2017), a pro bono habeas appeal. Mr. Muttreja has done extensive immigration-related work, as well, including with the National Immigrant Justice Center. His current pro bono representations include serving on behalf of a Brooklyn man in a dispute over his citizenship status, a Honduran child seeking immigration status (in affiliation with Kids in Need of Defense (KIND)), and a California prisoner in a § 1983 appeal.
Prior Experience:
Partner, Jones Day, 2018-present; associate, 2009-2018
Law Clerk, Hon. John M. Walker Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Education:
J.D., New York University School of Law
B.S., Yale University, molecular, cellular, and developmental biology
What advice would you give to young lawyers?
Keep an open mind and always be willing to try something new.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250