Turkish Bank Indicted on 6 Counts Stemming From Iran Sanctions-Busting Scheme
High-ranking officials in Iran and Turkey allegedly participated in the scheme, and some officials took tens of millions of dollars in bribes to shield it from the scrutiny of U.S. regulators and banks, prosecutors said.
October 15, 2019 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York on Tuesday announced criminal charges against Turkish state-run bank Halkbank in an alleged multibillion-dollar plot to help Iran evade U.S. economic sanctions.
The six-count indictment charged Halkbank with fraud, money laundering and sanctions offenses for its "systemic participation" in the massive scheme, which included designing fraudulent transactions meant to deceive U.S. regulators and foreign banks and then lying to cover up its involvement.
According to the indictment, Halkbank, which is majority-owned by the Turkish government, used a series of money service businesses and front companies in Iran, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates to transfer billions of dollars worth of Iranian oil revenue in violation of prohibitions barring Iran from accessing the U.S. financial system.
High-ranking officials in Iran and Turkey allegedly participated in the scheme, and some officials took tens of millions of dollars in bribes to shield it from the scrutiny of U.S. regulators and banks, prosecutors said.
Tuesday's indictment followed the conviction last year of Mehmet Hakan Atilla, a top Halkbank executive accused of purchasing gold and designing fraudulent transactions to look like purchases of food and medicine by Iranian citizens. Atilla was sentenced to 32 months after a federal jury convicted him on five counts of conspiracy, money laundering and related counts.
"The facts that emerged at the full, fair, and public trial of Halkbank's deputy general manager, which culminated in a jury's January 2018 guilty verdict against him, illustrated senior Halkbank management's participation in this brazen scheme to circumvent our nation's Iran sanctions regime," U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said Tuesday in a statement announcing the charges.
"Halkbank will now have to answer for its conduct in an American court," he said.
In total, Southern District prosecutors have charged nine people in connection with the scheme. Among them was Reza Zarrab, the Turkish-Iranian gold trader who pleaded guilty and later testified against Atilla at trial, saying that the executive had paid $50 million in bribes to Turkey's finance minister.
Before he began working with prosecutors, Zarrab had hired former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani to his legal team to meet with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and seek a diplomatic solution.
So far, only Atilla and Zarrab have been tried in the case, and the remaining defendants remain at large, Berman's office said.
Tuesday's indictment, however, signaled the next phase of the Justice Department's case and potentially exposed the bank to large fines and forfeitures. The indictment alleged that Halkbank acted as the sole repository for proceeds from Iran's sale of oil and gas to Turkey, and transferred approximately $20 billion worth of restricted funds that otherwise would have exposed it to sanctions under U.S. law.
According to the filing, Halkbank allowed the funds to be used to buy gold that was not exported to Iran and made transfers appear to fall within the so-called humanitarian exception to certain sanctions, which allows for purchases of food and medicine to be made by Iranian customers.
"Halkbank illegally facilitated the illicit transfer of billions of dollars to benefit Iran, and for far too long the bank and its leaders willfully deceived the United States to shield their actions from scrutiny. That deception ends today," said William Sweeney, director in charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's New York field office.
The case is being handled by the terrorism and international narcotics unit and money laundering and transnational criminal enterprises units of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan.
Turkey has denied allegations of wrongdoing by the bank.
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250