Litigation Department of the Year Finalist: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
Skadden's on-the-ground capabilities in financial centers around the globe, coupled with our culture of working seamlessly across offices and practices, enables us to quickly assemble formidable litigation teams no matter the subject matter or location of the dispute.
October 16, 2019 at 11:11 AM
4 minute read
What are some of the department's most satisfying successes of the past year and why? Our most satisfying achievements are those that resolve our clients' greatest litigation challenges in ways that best align with their broader business objectives. This year we achieved these types of outcomes in several notable matters, including:
We secured a complete trial victory for BlackRock, Inc. in one of the largest mutual fund cases ever. After an eight-day bench trial, the court issued a 72-page decision—the first trial decision to address the "subadvisory" theory—denying plaintiffs' $1.55 billion claim.
In another landmark case, on behalf of two Dutch subsidiaries of NextEra, Skadden obtained the largest award granted against Spain to date in the numerous claims filed against it by renewable energy investors, and more than double any other award rendered in these claims. We successfully argued that Spain's elimination of feed-in-tariffs and remuneration formulas breached the Energy Charter Treaty and entitled NextEra to damages of €290.6 million plus interest.
We obtained a range of victories for JPMorgan Chase, including negotiating a settlement in one of the biggest private antitrust litigations ever brought—involving a long-running dispute concerning the fees merchants pay when they accept credit and debit card payments.
We also are proud of our ongoing success in the securities litigation space, including securing the most federal securities defense wins and successfully resolving numerous high-profile underwriting syndicate matters.
A prospective client in crisis calls and asks why your team should be retained. What is your answer? Skadden's on-the-ground capabilities in financial centers around the globe, coupled with our culture of working seamlessly across offices and practices, enables us to quickly assemble formidable litigation teams no matter the subject matter or location of the dispute. In addition, our collaborative and strategic approach equips us to partner with our clients successfully throughout the lifecycle of a litigation.
What traits do you respect most in opposing firms and lawyers? We hold in the highest regard opposing counsel who litigate vigorously but always with integrity and respect for the profession, the courtroom and adversaries. We also admire opposing teams in which we see an appreciation of intelligence and professionalism, no matter seniority or pedigree.
What sorts of trends are you seeing in litigation, and what do you think will be the most important development in the law/legal business that will impact your field in the next 10 years? In the global economy, the lines between jurisdictions are becoming increasingly blurred. Accordingly, an understanding of the impact of relevant foreign laws and regulations will continue to be crucial for success, even in U.S.-based litigation.
What is the firm doing to ensure that future generations of litigators are ready to take the helm? It is worth emphasis that almost 95% of our New York litigation partners began their Skadden careers as associates. Because our success depends on investing in our associates' growth and development, partners serve as mentors to ensure that junior associates are given the opportunity to take active roles in all phases of litigation, both inside and outside the courtroom. We also provide extensive and ongoing training programs for each stage of associate development. Our core curriculum incorporates the firm's competencies, technical and substantive legal skills, work management skills, people skills and firm citizenship and values.
Finally, excellent lawyering goes hand-in-hand with fostering a diverse and inclusive culture. As one example, our Skadden 1L Scholars Program attracts the best and the brightest legal talent, including candidates whose life experiences, demonstrated interests and achievements can help enhance the firm's diversity and client service. More than half of our 1L Scholars return to the firm as associates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250