Litigation Department of the Year, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Our collaborative, bespoke teams frequently enable clients to prevail when the chips are down, the stakes are high, and time is short.
October 16, 2019 at 11:02 AM
5 minute read
What are some of the department's most satisfying successes of the past year and why? Only a small handful of securities cases (out of the thousands filed in the past 30 years) have gone all the way to a trial verdict, and Latham is one of the few major law firms to have taken not just one, but several of these cases through trial. Latham recently secured a jury trial win for Puma Biotechnology in the first federal securities class action to reach a verdict in nearly 10 years. In the same period, a Latham team represented UBS Securities before the New York Supreme Court in a high-profile lawsuit against Highland Capital.
Clients consistently turn to Latham to try their bet-the-company cases, but it is extremely rare to have one trial in this space in a single calendar year, let alone two. And Latham is gearing up for a third trial this December, on behalf of Walworth, the investment vehicle for the Ryan family, which is seeking hundreds of millions for alleged fraud in connection with the buyback of shares by Mu Sigma.
Furthermore, our collaborative, bespoke teams frequently enable clients to prevail when the chips are down, the stakes are high, and time is short. Two recent such collaborations, between our securities litigation & professional liability and Supreme Court & appellate practices, exemplify this approach. Following separate shareholder class action dismissals for Ferrellgas (secured by Jamie Wine) and for Endo International (won by Miles Ruthberg, Jeff Hammel, and Jimmy Brandt) in the Southern District of New York, plaintiffs in both matters filed their appeal before the Second Circuit. Latham's professional liability and appellate teams worked together to secure affirmations in both matters before the Second Circuit, with the opinions for each adopting the arguments Latham had advanced for our clients.
A prospective client in crisis calls and asks why your team should be retained. What is your answer? Latham's securities litigation and professional liability practice offers clients quantifiably more experience litigating—and winning—complex, bet-the-company securities litigation than any other law firm in the world. In 2018, our securities litigators handled 100 cases across 21 district courts, more than any other law firm. Our focus is always fighting for and achieving success for our clients. We develop and employ aggressive and creative litigation strategies that enable us to dispose of most matters well short of trial, whether through a dispositive motion or settlement; however, while securities cases rarely go to trial, Latham is one of the few firms to have achieved a successful jury verdict in recent history, and likely the only firm to have done so in multiple cases.
One of Latham's key differentiators is that, unlike most of our competitors, we are truly industry agnostic. While we are certainly the "go to" firm for life sciences and technology companies we also represent multinational conglomerates.
What traits do you respect most in opposing firms and lawyers? Litigation is by nature adversarial and yes, we're all there to advocate and achieve the best result for our client. But it's always more efficient, effective and enjoyable when the team across from you conducts themselves as any professional should—with respect, cordiality and honesty.
What sorts of trends are you seeing in litigation, and what do you think will be the most important development in the law/legal business that will impact your field in the next 10 years? Post-Cyan, we're likely to see an exponential increase of Securities Act claims filed in state court. Such an increase in state court litigation may raise new issues in terms of the application of other procedural protections of Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) to state court litigation.
What is the firm doing to ensure that future generations of litigators are ready to take the helm? Beyond the multitude of committees, academies, trainings and other leadership programs we have in place—which we continuously evolve in partnership with our younger bench—we encourage the entrepreneurial and collaborative spirit Latham is known for in our next generation of talent. From the very first, and with the guidance of partner mentors, our young litigators are encouraged to seize the reins to get standup experience. Handling depositions, witness prep, interactions with the client—all aspects of the case lifecycle are open to our younger team members because the best way to learn is by doing. And with our elite trial and litigation team as guides, there is nothing our young talent won't be able to successfully take on for our clients.
Responses prepared by Andrew Clubok and Jeff Hammel, New York-based global co-chairs of Latham's securities litigation and professional liability practice.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250