Litigation Department of the Year Winner: Cravath, Swaine & Moore
In the same month last year we saw two major wins that exemplify the high-stakes litigation and exceptional client relationships Cravath is known for.
October 16, 2019 at 11:12 AM
4 minute read
What are some of the department's most satisfying successes of the past year and why? In the same month last year we saw two major wins that exemplify the high-stakes litigation and exceptional client relationships Cravath is known for. For American Express, we won a Supreme Court victory that vindicated the company's business model and defines how antitrust law will be applied to two-sided markets. We led AmEx through a decade of investigation, trial and appeals, and the company trusted the firm and our strategy each step of the way. For Time Warner we defeated at trial a suit by the DOJ seeking to block the company's $109 billion merger with AT&T—the government's first challenge to a vertical merger in decades. Time has been a client for nearly a century and it was incredibly gratifying to usher the company through its latest transformation.
A prospective client in crisis calls and asks why your team should be retained. What is your answer? Dealing with crises is what Cravath does best. As a generalist firm, our attorneys have the breadth and depth of experience to handle clients' most important matters, no matter the practice area, tribunal or party role. We thrive when tackling the most complex and consequential matters, digging in from day one to develop the approach that will yield the best legal and business result. AmEx and Time Warner are great examples of this, but so is our recent work for Qualcomm in its massive legal battle against Apple, which included coordinating matters across three continents, trying two cases before the U.S. ITC, and securing a global settlement between the companies after opening arguments in a third trial in California.
What traits do you respect most in opposing firms and lawyers? Honesty and professionalism are important qualities for all attorneys and we appreciate opposing counsel who approach litigation not as a schoolyard fight, but as a way to resolve disputes professionally and civilly. We also have a great deal of respect for opposing lawyers with strong trial skills.
What sorts of trends are you seeing in litigation, and what do you think will be the most important development in the law/legal business that will impact your field in the next 10 years? The legal industry is constantly evolving and, as a 200-year-old firm, we've seen a lot of changes. We expect AI will deliver enormous benefits in the coming decade, including saving clients money and streamlining attorney training. We have expanded our use of AI at Cravath to enable our attorneys to focus more on the high-level work where they add the most value. We're also seeing greater segmentation in the legal profession as litigation has become increasingly commoditized. As a result, the top tier where the most important legal work is done—and where Cravath focuses—is becoming more competitive and firms will need to further distinguish themselves to remain in this space.
What is the firm doing to ensure that future generations of litigators are ready to take the helm? Associate training has been a hallmark of the firm for more than century. It is of paramount importance to us because we promote almost exclusively from within. We carefully select the most promising young attorneys straight from law school and train them in the Cravath style. For litigators, this means gaining broad experience by rotating through all practice areas and preparing for every matter as if it is going to trial. We also staff matters leanly, which gives our associates early opportunities for growth and leadership. Our partners went through the same rigorous training as associates and trust that the system prepares their associate teams to handle significant responsibilities at every stage.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250