New York Law School Adds Religious Training to Its Diversity Program
The Manhattan law school has partnered with the Interfaith Center of New York to give students and attorneys a basis in religion so they can better represent clients of faith.
October 16, 2019 at 02:02 PM
4 minute read
New York Law School wants to help students and lawyers better represent religious clients by giving them a foundation in religious literacy that will help them navigate the attorney and client relationship.
The Manhattan law school has partnered with the Interfaith Center of New York for a year-long series of programming aimed at teaching law students and attorneys about religion and how it may surface within the legal context, as well as legal outreach efforts to local religious organizations. Organizers hope the program will continue beyond the initial year.
It's the first such religious diversity program at a law school, according to Henry Goldschmidt, director of programs at the Interfaith Center. Some law schools offer religious liberty clinics, which represent clients in litigation over religious freedoms. And a few law schools, including Fordham University School of Law, offer programming on religious lawyering, which seeks to help law students integrate their personal faith and their professional life. But the new religious diversity initiative has a different focus, which is for attorneys to better understand and represent their clients through a basic familiarity with their religion.
"We are, frankly, more interested in the religious and spiritual background of the clients attorneys are serving," Goldschmidt said. "Our work is to help attorneys of any background, whether they are religious or secular, to help them work more effectively with religiously diverse clients. As far as I know, there is nothing else like that in New York or elsewhere."
The religious diversity initiative has three components. The first component is having each first-year student at New York Law School attend sessions on religious diversity as part of their professional development training, with the first such session starting next week. Those sessions will include conversations with local faith leaders and discussions among students about religion.
Goldschmidt said students will read case studies in which an understanding of religion was integral to an attorney effectively representing their client. For example, they will learn about a divorce case in which an Hasidic man sought full custody of his children because his ex-wife had come out as a lesbian and left the Orthodox Jewish faith, despite a clause in their divorce agreement that the children would be raised Orthodox.
"Regardless of what you think of the merits of his case, or the tension between his religious identity and her sexuality, if you're going to serve him as a client, you need to understand, 'What does it mean to a Hasidic Jew that their children be raised according to certain standards?'" Goldschmidt said.
Similarly, law students will learn about a case in which a Sikh Metropolitan Transit Authority worker successfully fought a policy that he wear an MTA logo on his turban. It's important to understand why a Sikh client would not want to wear a pin on their turban, which is considered a religious garment, Goldschmidt added.
A second component of the program involves training third-year law students to provide legal outreach to religious communities. After receiving religious diversity instruction, the upper-class students will offer "know your rights" sessions to congregations affiliated with the Interfaith Center of New York. The topics may include immigration, domestic violence, nonprofit and small business law, investor protection, and housing rights.
Lastly, the school plans to host a religious diversity and legal practice symposium in March 2020 where attorneys may earn CLE credit to fulfill the diversity, inclusion, and elimination of bias CLE requirement. Attendees will hear remarks from Chief Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as well as religious leaders, faith-based activists, and attorneys who work with a broad array of religious clients.
Organizers hope the new initiative will fill a gap in the diversity instruction lawyers and law students receive.
"I think it's not something that we speak about," said Swati Parikh, the law school's executive director of public service and pro bono initiatives. "Students aren't taking classes where they are being taught cultural competency in relation to religion. We certainly discuss implicit bias and cultural competency, but it's more in the context of race, ethnicity, and gender. Not so much religion."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute read'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readLippman Study on Antisemitism at CUNY Weighs Free Speech, Unprotected Acts
'Illegal Conspiracy'?: EDNY Antitrust Class Action Challenges Publishers' 'Unpaid Peer Review Rule'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250