Distinguished Leader: Carlos Méndez-Peñate
NY Office Managing Partner, Akerman
October 17, 2019 at 11:10 AM
4 minute read
What are some of your proudest recent achievements? From a professional perspective, serving in my role as Akerman's office managing partner for New York and serving as the leader in recruiting, I am extremely gratified by the success in our efforts to grow Akerman's New York office from 35 lawyers to 125. We have built a balanced, diverse office in the most competitive legal market in the country featuring world-class talent who embrace the firm's collaborative culture. And our work continues. From a philanthropic perspective, I am proud of contributing to improving the lives of children in the foster care system in New York and nationally through CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates). We make a real difference in the lives of children, which is incredibly rewarding.
What does it mean to be a leader? Being leader means having a clear vision of the future, articulating that vision, and rallying the stakeholders to not only buy in to the vision but to fully embrace it and take ownership in making it a reality. The key is clarity on the future path: You have to know where you are going for people to follow you. This applies to counseling clients as well. In many respects, they have the vision, but they need lawyers to help them chart a path to achieving it.
Name a lawyer or mentor whose leadership inspired you. I have had the privilege of working with—and learning from—some of the most talented lawyers in the business, including David Boies, Evan Chesler (current chairman of Cravath, Swaine and Moore), and Thomas Barr, a legendary partner at Cravath. Tom was a force with his combination of superior legal intellect and project management skills. This was best exemplified when he led a team I was on at the beginning of my career in the mid-1970s, of 35 lawyers in U.S. v. IBM. Tom was masterful in running a very large team in a high stakes, publicly scrutinized, complex, and fast paced litigation in which IBM ultimately prevailed. It was an inspiring demonstration of strategic vision, litigation prowess, and management expertise.
How are the business and profession of law changing, and how should lawyers adapt for the future? In important ways, law has not changed. It is still a demanding, intense profession requiring intellectual rigor and discipline. The challenge for the future lies in the appropriate use of technology, which offers tremendous efficiencies and opportunities for our profession. Artificial intelligence, blockchain, online doc services—these are great tools for lawyers. But they are just tools. To put them in proper perspective, technology adds arrows in the quiver of a lawyer, but our challenge is not to rely on them as a crutch. We must still exercise all the traditional traits of lawyers on behalf of our clients: judgment, probity, critical thinking, empathy, communication, leadership, and vision. Technology enhances our ability to advise clients, but does not supplant our role. Law will always require a real exchange between experienced lawyers who understand the facts, the precedent, the emotions, and the context to deliver results to clients.
What is the best advice for someone considering a career in law, or someone already in the profession who is seeking to make a greater impact? Law is a profession requiring an innate passion. You need an insatiable curiosity because there is much to learn—about the law, about business, about people. It is a serious commitment of time, intensity, and dedication to helping clients achieve goals—because that is, at the end of the day, the measure of success: is your client satisfied. If you do not have the proverbial "fire in the belly," this can be a tough industry. But the rewards for those who do? Law has allowed me to guide transformative transactions for my clients, to become acquainted with a diversity of people, cultures, and businesses, and it has taken me around the world. I cannot imagine doing anything else.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKenneth Feinberg Had Dreams of Being on the Big Screen. His 9/11 Victims Fund Gave Him an Unexpected Star Turn
City Bar Holds 32nd Annual Henry L. Stimson Medal Presentation
The 2024 Winners of the Law Journal's Professional Excellence Awards
Litigation Departments of the Year Winner, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250