In what is being called an extraordinary reversal of a former teacher’s conviction on 11 counts of abuse involving young students, a state appeals court has ruled that a Queens judge wrongfully allowed at trial an “unfettered passageway for the [prosecution] to elicit extensive and prejudicial evidence regarding alleged uncharged complaints” of other student sexual abuse allegedly committed by the teacher.

“The high risk of unfair prejudice … as a result of the jury hearing that more than 10 students allegedly made complaints against [the teacher] outweighed any potential probative value of such evidence,” wrote the Appellate Division, Second Department in the decision. “We hold that the Supreme Court’s ruling deprived the defendant of his right to a fair trial.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]