Rents Rise—and Lease Expirations Loom—for New York Law Firms
Almost a quarter of the available square footage occupied by law firms in Manhattan is up for renewal between 2021 and 2024, according to CBRE.
October 24, 2019 at 03:17 PM
4 minute read
If it seems like there have been a lot of law firm real estate moves lately, just wait.
According to a yet-to-be-published report by commercial real estate services and investment firm CBRE, leases covering a whopping 8.5 million square feet of law firm office space in Manhattan are set to expire between 2021 and 2024, setting up a round of musical chairs in the city—and placing additional pressures on firms as rents continue to increase.
Law firm rents in the Midtown real estate market rose 15% in the first half of 2019, according to CBRE. Be that as it may, Midtown is still the place to be for Big Law in Manhattan, with 80% of the top 25 firms by square footage occupancy located in the long-time legal hub.
The study, which includes the amount of square footage leased, occupancy levels, leasing activity, rent levels and space use, among other elements, offers a granular look at the Manhattan legal community's real estate activities over the first half of this year.
Some of the conclusions are in line with well-recognized trends, like firms using less space and preferring more "modern" designs with equal sized offices and more common areas to house associates.
Some are more surprising, like a 7% drop in downtown rents year over year, according to the report.
The study included 1,644 law firms in the city that occupy a little over 35 million square feet of space in Manhattan. The top occupiers had spaces that ranged from 280,000 square feet on the low end to over 650,000. In aggregate, the legal sector occupies 9.3% of all available commercial real estate space in Manhattan, according to CBRE.
The study found that there will be a lot of upcoming activity, as almost a quarter of the available square footage occupied by law firms will come up for renewal between 2021 and 2024. No less than 1.4 million square feet of expirations will take place each year between 2021 and 2027.
CBRE breaks down Midtown into its submarkets: "Park," "Times Square/West" and "6th Avenue/Rockefeller Center." When it comes to the top 25 firms by square footage occupied, "6th Avenue/Rockefeller Center" housed 30%, while "Park" took 25% and "Times Square/West" came in third with 15%.
Overall rent figures, hardly surprisingly, are rising. Rent in spaces occupied by law firms saw year-over-year growth of 9% from 2017 to 2018, and have grown 15% since the end of the year, according to CBRE.
In terms of taking rates per square foot, that means $99.62 for law firms in Midtown, which is quite a bit higher than the overall Midtown average rent of $81.72, CBRE said.
The downtown area, mostly consisting of the Financial District and City Hall areas when it comes to law firm presence, makes for 20% of the Manhattan law firm real estate market. Like Midtown, the area saw year-over-year growth in rent from 2017 to 2018, increasing 13%. Unlike Midtown, though, rents in 2019 are down 7% from the end of 2018, according to CBRE.
The Hudson Yards development and neighboring area, already housing or preparing to house some major firms, seems to be the main threat to Midtown's market domination. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and McKool Smith have already moved into One Manhattan West. Milbank, Boies Schiller Flexner and Cooley have all moved into 55 Hudson Yards, and Cravath, Swaine & Moore will move into Two Manhattan West in 2024.
Not everyone's headed west, however. Katten Muchin Rosenman just decided to move spaces but stay in Midtown, deciding to move into 50 Rockefeller Center in 2022.
|Read More
Cravath to Move West to New Manhattan Office Tower
Hogan Lovells Prepares for Move Into 'Bold' New Manhattan Office
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStanding on Less Shaky Ground: 'Guthrie' Decision Impact on NY Wage and Hour Matters
7 minute readThe First Amendment on Trial: Factors That Influence Juror Receptivity
9 minute readThe Pros and Cons of Generative AI in Connection With Litigation Practices
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rules Mere Conduit Defense Not Suitable for a Motion to Dismiss
- 2Ironclad Officially Launches New Gen AI Assistant Jurist
- 3After Litigation with Ex-COO, Proskauer Fills Role
- 4Federal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
- 5Trade Secret Litigation: How Will AI Innovations Likely Be Litigated?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250