NY AG's Office Calls for More Funding to Comply With New Criminal Procedure Requirements
A representative for New York Attorney General Letitia James testified before state lawmakers that her office will need $10.2 million in new funding to comply with the laws.
October 28, 2019 at 12:40 PM
7 minute read
The New York Attorney General's Office echoed the concerns of local prosecutors in New York on the implementation of the state's new discovery laws during a public hearing in Albany on Monday, saying more funding will be required for a smooth transition over the next year.
A representative for New York Attorney General Letitia James testified before state lawmakers that her office will need $10.2 million in new funding to comply with the laws.
Kate Powers, director of legislative affairs for the Attorney General's Office, testified that James agrees with local district attorneys that more funding will be needed across the board as the state begins implementation of the new laws at the start of next year.
"Our office is providing testimony today to say that we strongly support these requests and urge you to account for these needs in the upcoming 2020 budget," Powers said.
In the near future, Powers said, the Attorney General's Office is seeking $500,000 to comply with its immediate discovery needs. An additional $9.7 million is needed for the outlying years, she said.
Powers, acting as a surrogate for James, said the Attorney General's Office supports the new laws as they were approved by the state Legislature, but that there were serious concerns about implementation in both their office and those of local district attorneys statewide.
That same concern has been raised multiple times over the last several months by local prosecutors and their trade group, the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York.
Orange County District Attorney David Hoovler, the current president of DAASNY, repeated their call for additional funding before state lawmakers at the hearing Monday. Hoovler said he felt their concerns had gone unheard by Democrats in the state Legislature.
"Many upstate offices feel like nobody in our state government is listening," Hoovler said. "The ultimate success of these laws depends on prosecutors being able to comply with them. We are asking for help."
Hoovler said DAASNY, relying on data from the New York State Association of Counties, has predicted that approximately $100 million will be needed outside New York City to comply with the new discovery laws.
He was joined at the hearing by seven district attorneys from counties outside New York City. They testified that additional funding would be primarily used to hire more staff to ensure compliance with the law and upgrade technology for prosecutors and local law enforcement.
Monday's hearing was the second held by state lawmakers in recent months on the implementation of the new laws, which take effect in January.
They were approved as part of a larger package of criminal justice reform measures folded into this year's state budget in March. The legislation also included changes to the state's laws on cash bail and the right to a speedy trial.
State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx, organized Monday's hearing as chair of the state Senate Codes Committee, which typically considers changes to the state Criminal Procedure Law. He was among the strongest supporters of the new laws earlier this year.
Bailey rallied with public defenders and criminal justice advocates before the hearing in support of the new law but made clear that he was in Albany to hear testimony on implementation.
"At the end of the day, no matter what side you're on, you want fairness in the justice system," Bailey said.
During the hearing, Bailey said he was open to allocating more funding for prosecutors to comply with the new laws. He said he'll bring those concerns to his colleagues for possible legislative action when the Legislature reconvenes in January.
"I'm not saying you shouldn't receive increases," Bailey said. "In private meetings we've had, in hearings we've had, no one can say I've said 'don't give DAs money.' I have not said that. I will never say that."
When the new laws take effect at the beginning of next year, prosecutors and the defense will be required to exchange the first phase of discovery within 15 days of a person's arraignment.
That deadline didn't previously exist in state law, which meant that defense attorneys, in some cases, weren't provided with discoverable material until days before trial. Some prosecutors, like the Brooklyn District Attorney's Office, had already implemented their own reforms to create a more open exchange of discovery with the defense.
The 15-day deadline for discovery isn't set in stone. Prosecutors can delay the due date for an additional 30 days if the discoverable material is too much to exchange within that time or they don't have the actual material in their possession.
Bailey was the lone Democrat present at the hearing. It was also attended by three Republican members of the state Senate, including Sen. Thomas O'Mara, who previously served as the Chemung County District Attorney before he was elected to the state Senate.
O'Mara, like the other Republicans on the panel, were critical of the new laws at the beginning of the hearing. Sen. Daphne Jordan, R-Saratoga, urged Democrats, who hold the majority in both chambers of the Legislature, to allocate more funding for prosecutors in next year's state budget, or repeal the new laws altogether.
"Discovery within 15 days of arraignment is a very narrow time frame, especially in cases where prosecutors are dealing with multiple police agencies," Jordan said. "The cost of all this? District attorney's offices and town justice offices need more resources to come into compliance with these reforms. Who's paying for all this?"
Prosecutors in New York may not know if they'll receive more funding from the state to comply with the new laws until late March, when lawmakers finish negotiations on the state budget with Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
That process starts with a first draft of the budget that's proposed by Cuomo in January. Cuomo, in the past, has been skeptical about whether prosecutors will need more funding to comply with the changes.
READ MORE:
Prosecutors Warn of Rough Transition to New Discovery Laws Without More Funding
Cuomo, Lawmakers Announce Deal on State Budget, Criminal Justice Reforms
Attorneys for Assembly Speaker Move to Uphold Prosecutorial Watchdog Panel
Legal Action Won't Be Needed to Expunge Low-Level Marijuana Convictions, Lawmaker Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250