Remembering the Tumultuous Years Under Special Prosecutor Maurice Nadjari
It all began in 1972 when a New York City Police officer named Frank Serpico went to the New York Times to tell his story of widespread police corruption. That was a big deal. It was even a bigger deal when Frank Serpico was shot in the head shortly after that.
October 29, 2019 at 01:32 PM
4 minute read
Last week Maurice Nadjari passed away at the age of 95. To anyone under the age of 50, it's understandable if the name doesn't ring a bell. To anyone from New York over 50 you have no excuse. From 1972 till 1977 before Nadjari crashed and burned in the race for Queens District Attorney, he was in all the headlines.
Nadjari was the leading story on TV news and every opener on 1010 WINS began with "today NYS Special Prosecutor Maurice Nadjari said . . . . ." For half a decade New York State Special Prosecutor Maurice Nadjari was everywhere with a press conference announcing a cure to all of the ills plaguing us, from the police to courthouse corruption.
It all began in 1972 when a New York City Police Officer named Frank Serpico went to the New York Times to tell his story of widespread police corruption. That was a big deal. It was even a bigger deal when Frank Serpico was shot in the head shortly after that.
Then there was the biggest heroin bust of all time known as The French Connection case. Six million dollars in smack stored in the NYPD property clerk's office. The heroin walked out the door and Sidney Lumet quickly made a movie about it and Mayor John Lindsay created a commission to investigate what everyone already knew. That commission was headed by federal Judge Whitman Knapp and famously called the Knapp Commission. New York's Governor Nelson Rockefeller, who spent most of his waking hours figuring out ways to make Lindsay look bad, announced the creation of the Office of the New York State Special Prosecutor. This new office would take on the police and political corruption that the District Attorneys' would not.
Heading the office would be Maurice Nadjari, a career prosecutor whose parents were Sephardic Jews from Greece. Rockefeller wanted a show that would push Lindsay out of the headlines and Nadjari was his showrunner. Nadjari's political corruption crusades began with the indictments of 12 Judges, but, as time went on, 9 of the indictments were dismissed, two cases resulted in not guilty verdicts at trial and the one conviction Nadjari did win was reversed on appeal. Nothing stuck.
Then there was the odd misdemeanor indictment of Queens District Attorney Tommy Mackell. Mackell was convicted and resigned from office, but that conviction was also reversed on appeal. But the strangest one of all was Nadjari's announcement that he would be bringing indictments against the cops who stole the smack in the French Connection case. That was 45 years ago and still no charges. Times changed. By 1975 Lindsay was in exile. Nadjari's sponsor Nelson Rockefeller moved on to the White House and the new governor, Hugh Carey, gave Nadjari six months to wrap things up. Nadjari could not commit to that so Carey gave him till the end of the week. Nadjari went home to Queens and in 1977 ran against the newly installed DA John Santucci in his first race. Santucci, a former city councilman and state senator, knew how to walk the streets and work the neighborhoods. Nadjari was not a natural campaigner. It would be his first and last run for office.
Santucci won by a large margin running on the Democrat, Liberal and Conservative lines. Nadjari ran on the Republican ticket headed by Roy Goodman. Nadjari conceded the race gracefully and was never heard from again.
A decade later a reporter caught up with Nadjari who had built a criminal defense practice on Long Island. When the reporter asked Nadjari about the decade of silence his response was "you can't make money defending innocent people." John O'Hara is a lawyer who lives in Brooklyn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250